Sandy Hook Hoax Wayback Machine - Debunking Alex Jones Smoking Gun Proof

Alex Jones claimed the "Wayback Machine" is his "smoking gun proof of cover-up".  Alex Jones is correct about one thing; the Wayback Machine is the only (so-called) "evidence" the hoaxers have that the Sandy Hook was not in operation.  Other than that, Alex Jones uses deceptive tactics to hide the real links to Sandy Hook School archive from his viewers.

In this episode of Sandy Hook Facts, I debunk hoaxer Alex Jones and prove the Wayback Machine is smoking gun proof the school was open.  I also prove Alex Jones source was none other than Jim Fetzer and the Jones had to have engaged in intentionally misrepresentation in order to share Jim Fetzer's theory as "smoking gun proof".  Alex Jones is intentionally slapping Sandy Hook families in the face and openly mocking them.

Simple question
How can Alex Jones want to be considered as real news when he calls debunked Jim Fetzer tripe "smoking gun proof of cover-up"?  This proves Alex Jones is FAKE NEWS.

The Source - Jim Fetzer
Alex Jones' source was a Jim Fetzer article. How can Alex Jones publish Jim Fetzer tripe and expect not to be categorized as Fake News.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/newtown-school-board-the-newtown-bee-complicit-in-the-sandy-hook-hoax/

Debunked in 2014 by Sandy Hook Facts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJMBfuZJHVM

Perhaps Alex Jones will share Jim Fetzer's Mossad death squad theory next:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/newtown-school-board-the-newtown-bee-complicit-in-the-sandy-hook-hoax/

Those articles were before Jim Fetzer, James Tracy, and Wolfgang Halbig authored "No One Died at Sandy Hook"; debunked as fiction and misinformation by Sandy Hook Facts many times, including here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0Vse-FLwLw


In this episode, I prove that Alex Jones used deception to hide the fact he presented the wrong link for the Sandy Hook School for the period of the shooting. Using the wrong link, he claimed the Wayback machine showed no internet activity.

By using the wrong link, he claimed this to be Smoking Gun Proof of cover-up because there was no Internet Traffic at the Sandy Hook school Website in 2012.  

In doing so, Alex Jones copied a meme created by Jim Fetzer and thus, proves that Infowars has as much credibility as Jim Fetzer. ; ie NONE.  Info wars is proven to be FAKE NEWS using deceptive tactics and pushing Debunked False memes to intentionally mislead the public with FALSE information under the guise of "Smoking Gun Proof".

This is proof Alex Jones is a two-bit hoaxer grief troll, who intentionally harms Sandy Hook families by presenting debunked tripe as fact.

Reference Links



Crisis Actors Guild
Why “The Most Compelling Evidence” In “Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” Is A Total Bust
http://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2016/05/12/why-the-most-compelling-evidence-in-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook-is-a-total-bust/

Smoking gun PROOF Alex Jones hid the real 2012 Sandy Hook School website from his audience.

Alex Jones showed only the 2000-2006 link:
http://www.newtown.k12.ct.us/~sh

Screen Shot of Alex Jones "Final Statement"
Proof he his the real 2012 Sandy Hook website

Wayback Machine Web Archive Links:
These are the links dishonest hoaxers such as Jim Fetzer and Alex Jones don't want you to know about.

Sandy Hook School - 2000-2006
(This is the only link Alex Jones allowed his views to see)
http://web.archive.org/web/20070701000000*/http://www.newtown.k12.ct.us/~sh

Sandy Hook School - 2006-2010
http://web.archive.org/web/20070701000000*/http://www.newtown.k12.ct.us/shs

Sandy Hook School - 2010-2016
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://newtown.sandyhook.schooldesk.net

Sandy Hook School - 2016 to present
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sandyhook.newtown.schooldesk.net


"No Internet Activity" - Debunked

WHY “THE MOST COMPELLING EVIDENCE” IN “NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK” IS A TOTAL BUST

http://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2016/05/12/why-the-most-compelling-evidence-in-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook-is-a-total-bust/

Newtown disallowed Wayback Machine crawling for their entire distrct from 2008-2010 and they they changed servers for their schools to SchoolDesk.net.

How do disallow Wayback Machine:
http://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2016/05/12/why-the-most-compelling-evidence-in-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook-is-a-total-bust/

How can I have my site’s pages excluded from the Wayback Machine?
You can exclude your site from display in the Wayback Machine by placing a robots.txt file on your web server that is set to disallow User-Agent: ia_archiver. You can also send an email request for us to review to info@archive.org with the URL (web address) in the text of your message.

And what is a robots.txt file? From Wikipedia:

The robots exclusion standard, also known as the robots exclusion protocol or simply robots.txt, is a standard used by websites to communicate with web crawlers and other web robots. The standard specifies how to inform the web robot about which areas of the website should not be processed or scanned.

Sure enough, we can see that on June 4th, 2008, the webmaster for Newtown’s public schools added the following to their robots.txt file:

And what do those two lines do?

This “User-agent: *” means this section applies to all robots. The “Disallow: /” tells the robot that it should not visit any pages on the site.

Alex Jones abuses Sandy Hook Families with Lies - Debunked and Exposed

Alex Jones abuses Sandy Hook Families with Lies - Debunked and Exposed

President Elect was asked by Sandy Hook families to disavow hoaxer Alex Jones.

Alex Jones is a proven Sandy Hook hoaxer. But Jones hopes to maintain a semblence of credibility so he denies the fact, with bold faced lies,.

Alex Jones could have apologized to the families. But Alex Jones did not do that.  Instead Alex doubled  down and regurgitated debunked hoaxer lies; he did so intentionally, and with the black hearted desire to hurt families of the tragedy.

Alex Jones debunked and exposed for the liar and Sandy Hook hoaxer that he is:

Other related topics

Alex Jones Black Hearted Sandy Hook Hoaxer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgmYW1awMB4

Sandy Hook Time Stamps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6ueQJZhp94


Sandy Hook Victims not in Social Security Death Index Debunked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHrpeYIPK-o

Sandy Hook Hoax Debunked- Lives Lost Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O66sDsKLK94

Pulse Night Club Body Cam Footage - Raw footage

Using a FOI request, SandyHookFacts.com obtained all of the "Body Cam" footage released by Florida's Orange County Sheriff on Nov. 11, 2016.

These videos are being uploaded to my channel for research purposes.

https://www.youtube.com/c/Sandyhookfacts

11/15/16 - Update- The videos are being uploaded as four sets due to the number of files involved.  Please be patient while I clean up the mess.

Set A - Active Shooter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6vZF6VJF0g

Set B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvF3YcEnzQA
Set C
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqxAIR9vCXk
Set D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y10ufdxOo8w

Hoaxer Bryce Cuellar placed on probation for his terroristic threats

In yet another example of the danger and violence exuded by Sandy Hook hoaxer conspiracy theorist, Popular Youtuber  Bryce Cuellar aka "fisherofmen" has been sentenced to probation.  Bryce is also a follower of the Bundy Clan and Gavin Seim; making him that much more dangerous as that means it is doubtful he will comply his his terms of probation; especially the fact Cuellar can no longer  possess weapons of any kind.

On 11/1/16 Bryce Cuellar plead guilty to felony " COUNT 1 - MAKING THREATS OR CONVEYING FALSE INFORMATION CONCERNING ACTS OF TERRORISM".

Bryce's 18-48 months prison sentence was suspended and he was placed on probation under the following special terms:

1) Complete a substance abuse evaluation and any recommend case plan.
2) Undergo a mental health evaluation by a licensed professional and complete any recommend case plan.
3) No alcohol whatsoever.
4) Abide by any curfew imposed by probation officer.
5) Defendant shall be permitted to continue his You Tube channel and blog but his speech will be subject to scrutiny by P&P.
 6) Defendant must avoid making any threats to harm immigrants, gays, lesbians or anybody else.
 7) Do not possess or display any weapons.

Thankfully, he is no longer allowed to posses weapons. Lets hope Clark County Sheriff inspects his home often to ensure compliance and the safety ofothers.  Bryce was well known for drunken rants threatening to kill people in the LGBT community as well as many others.

Bryce took to his Youtube channel immediately upon his release publishing wild-eyed illuminati anti-American drivel.

I also note with interest that he has his windows blacked out; reminiscent of the Sandy Hook shooter.

Jonathan Reich vs Patch.com lawsuit hopes to carve new exception to Statute of Limitations

"The mainstream media has neglected their duties and refused to report on a case of national attention" - HartfordCommunityCourt.com admitting Jonathan Reich's public interest status based on their  "pro-Jonathan Reich" website, an entire web blog dedicated to the Jonathan Reich criminal prosecution by Connecticut. 

Jonathan Reich is suing Patch.com (Reich v. Patch Media, Charles C. Hale et al) for Defamation and other defamation linchpinned claims .

Patch.com struck back with a powerful motion to dismiss response, which among other things, pleads that the suit is years past statute of limitations, as was covered here:
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/09/dismissal-sought-in-jonathan-reich-vs.html

As a side note, SandyHookFacts.com was disturbed to learn that one of Sandy Hoax Group's racist shills was launching fundraiser drives for Jonathan Reich while, apparently, speaking with Reich himself.  When Robin, aka "HowISeetheworld" is not calling for attacks of government officials, he is anti-American racist Nazi who rails about his hatred of Jews on near daily basis.  SandyHookFacts.com finds Robin's racism disgusting and nauseating.   You can listen to some his vitriol and antisemitic tirade here:

Reich's motion was originally set for October; however, Patch.com attorneys agreed with Reich's request to postpone the motion for further pleadings.

On the deadline day, Jonathan Reich finally responded to  Patch.com's motion to dismiss.

I'm going to offer a few thoughts on the pleading.

Wilder's alleged failure to communicate with Defendant
To begin the pleading, Reich's attorney, Nick Wilder, rages for three pages about how his alleged illness was the cause of his failure to respond to Patch.com attorney's after filing suit.

Rather than risk contact from one of Mr. Wilder's nephrlogists, SHF will just move on from that issue and wish him the best in his continued recovery from "illness" and such.  I doubt the court will entertain the "he said / no he said" issue at all. The case is on track and whether Wilder was really too sick to to take five minutes to reply is really moot now.

Wilder then conflates a Motion to Dismiss and a motion for Summary Judgement. This is all nonsense; however, if Reich clears the Statute hurdle, the case would likely at least proceed to discovery.


Statute of Limitations
It is simple. New York has a one year statute of limitations. The articles were written over three years ago. Done, right?

 The lawsuit appeared frivolous; however,  Reich attorney appears to be attempting trying to carve himself out a brand new exception to the statute of limitations.  Buried in his pleading is just a few nonspecific paragraphs on the subject.

In short, it appears Reich will argue that the creation of a slippery slope is in order, and that each time Patch.com created a new subdomain for itself, it was a republication of the original link, and thus restarting the statute of limitations.  To support their argument, they rely on the above case where the appeals court specifically did not rule on that issue.

Reich is hoping to set a new precedent that would allow him to hurdle the statute of limitations for defamation; almost negating the statue itself when applied to large news websites.    If the court did find that this action by Patch.com was a republication, it could rule the lawsuit may proceed.

 It also means the court could bag out of this case easily by simply rejecting Reich's argument, dismissing the case, and letting it go die on appeal.  That appears to be the most logical route the court would go.

It seems reasonable the court would offer the parites some time to present their argument before ruling on Patch's motion to dismiss.

No case against the reporters individually
Also note that Reich sued reporters, such as Jessie Sawyer, individually. It doesn't seem Reich is even attempting to present an argument to support a cause of action against the reporters individually and as to those allegations, Reich will surely lose.

No examples given
Wilder intentionally did not provide any examples of republication in his pleading; so whether Plaintiff's even have a legitimate example of republication remains to be seen.

Either way, that is a matter of law the court will decide and that makes the ruling anyone's guess.  It does appear this case could offer further fundraising opportunity as it will likely drag on for several months.

Sandy Hook Facts.com will closely look at the merits of the case if Reich hurdles the time bar; however, don't expect to be impressed with the case.  The pleading is as weak as you have come to expect from other hoaxer lawsuits.

Reich alleges gems such as:

 "Malicious intent is found when publishing witness names and details not
authorized to be published according to Avon Police Department procedures, and
through the controlled release of pre-written articles."

So we would need to believe courts must gauge itself on Avon Police procedures and whether those police procedures restrain our first amendment protected press?  The court will roll it's eyes over such nonsense.

Want another?

“the article published on 5/22/2013 claimed that Plaintiff made ‘threatening calls’ to the Chief Medical examiner” and the “statement falsely claims as a factual matter that Mr. Reich ‘harassed’ Dr. Carver”

The article is here and it claims no such thing:
http://patch.com/connecticut/farmington/ct-chief-medical-examiner-received-threatening-calls-referencing-newtown-shooting-probe

More outrageously, Reich is presently a fugitive from justice and Connecticut has a warrant out for his arrest for $100,000 on that very case.

Can a fugitive sue for defamation while hiding from answering the charges of Connecticut? That is an interesting legal question!

Hoaxers themselves admit Reich's case is of national interest
Most importantly, Reich completely forgets his status as a public figure by virtue of the fact he is involved in a prosecution of public interest.  The people have a First Amendment right to discuss cases, especially those of "national interest."

Aside from the fact Reich himself is going on international radio programs such as John Wells, Reich's own supporters create websites dedicated solely to his case:

Reich's people call his cases deserving of "national attention", and they even call the press themselves to ask them to cover the story, according to the HartfordCommunityCourt website.  HartfordCommunityCourt.com is a ruse of a website that purports itself to be a legal blog when in reality it is site dedicated to spreading Reich's case throughout the interwebs.

Yet, Reich wants to sue when people they publicly discuss his case?  It appears Reich might want to fund raise off of people discussing his case while pressuring media not to discuss his case while his friends beg the media to cover the case.

You can't have it both ways, Jonny!  Reich just might want to read what his friends are publishing, Your case is public record and of national importance; in that I agree with the SandyHookJustice websites.  HartfordCommunityCourt has dozens of articles on Jonathan Reich (in fact, it is their sole reason for existence).   Hoaxers  bemoan the fact that main stream news are not covering it: "it is disheartening to see that journalists and loggers have refused to report.."   and "when the case is directly brought to the attention [of mainstream reporters], a blind eye was the response."

By stipulation, the Defendants have until Nov. 25 to respond and a conference is set for December 5.


So in closing, obviously, the lawsuit is bogus and littered with nonsense.   Cases such as this are why SandyHookFacts.com supports nationwide the SLAPP protections, such as those offered in SandyHookFacts jurisdiction, California.

You may download the court documents from New York's website https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASSearch?param=P - (Case # 156787/2016)



Small link: http://bit.ly/2fHbZ38 to this article

Facial Recognition Expert Debunks Wolfgang Halbig

"This is a real no-brainer. I don’t even have to measure anything to tell you these are not the same girl.  I can see at a glance how far off they are in terms of appearance. And age has nothing to do with this comparison at all. The face lengthens and teeth can change with age, but those are irrelevant in this comparison." - Expert Joelle Steele

This information is being re-blogged from CrisisActorsGuild.com.  To read the full article, please visit-

Facial Recognition Expert Debunks the Hoaxers --

Shill Murray, author of "CrisisActorsGuild.com hit another homerun when he reached out to a real facial recognition expert to have her weigh on the hoaxer claim the Avielle Richman is actually younger photos of a teenager living in Newtown.  The results were as expected.  Obviously, the two girls are not the same.

The hoaxers were soundly debunked.

Who is this expert?

Joelle Steele is an expert who comes with 30 years of experience and literally wrote the book on facial comparisons.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00MXH26L4

The stalking of a child
The Sandy Hook Hoaxers, led by hoaxer leaders Wolfgang Halbig and Tony Mead, have caused their followers to torture a Newtown family based on a theory originally offered by Youtubers that Newtown victim Avielle Richman was "played" by a child who lives in Newtown.  The teen-aged girl and her family are relentlessly hounded at the their homes, work, and school.

See coverage of this issue - "Hoaxers double down on gangstalking"
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/09/hoaxers-double-down-on-gangstalking_53.html

The organized gang stalking of this child has really exposed a depraved side of the already nefarious hoaxer cult.

Enter Dallas expert James Appleton

James Appleton, an video expert out of Dallas, Texas decided he would take Halbig money to do a ridiculous comparison of mostly "Avielle vs Avielle" photos.     For $700, this alleged expert compared photos prepared by Tony's hoaxers such as this one:

Obviously the hoaxers took a photo of Avielle and flipped it. Adding to the idiocy, they photoshopped both girls' name to the forehead.  This tomfoolery was apparently lost on the befuddled "expert"  Appleton.

With easy money in hand, Appleton promptly declared the girls to be the same and pocketed the cash.

When Appleton learned he had effectively declared a deceased Sandy Hook victim to be a living, Newtown resident, he issued an apology - but the damage was done. Dallas video expert James Appleton was was now the unwitting clown posted dumped center stage of the Halbig fund raising circus.

The debunking

First - it doesn't take an expert to see that the girls are different. While they have a similar appearance; that is about it. Once you look closely, they are obviously not the same child.  But what did the real expert has to say.

CrisisActorsGuild wrote:

When I contacted Joelle, I introduced myself as a blogger who spent a lot of time researching the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. I wasn’t sure if she was aware that the shooting was the subject of a number of conspiracy theories (most people aren’t), so I explained the situation, and the Super Bowl angle in particular, to her. This was done in order to avoid any legal and/or ethical issues. And while I made it clear as to where I stood on the subject, I told her that I wanted her honest, unbiased opinion, and that I would gladly pay her for it up front. Joelle wrote back and said that she was willing to do the work, but would need at least three high-quality photographs of each subject so that she could project them up onto an eight foot screen for analysis, as is her standard procedure. In return, I sent over the absolute best photographs that I could find, for her approval. Shortly thereafter, Joelle wrote back. This is her reply, in its entirety:

Text:

From: Face Comparisons
Subject: RE: Hi, Joelle. Some questions…

This is a real no-brainer. I don’t even have to measure anything to tell you these are not the same girl.  I can see at a glance how far off they are in terms of appearance. And age has nothing to do with this comparison at all. The face lengthens and teeth can change with age, but those are irrelevant in this comparison. Here’s what I immediately see:

Ears don’t match in shape, pattern, and placement on head.
Jaws don’t match, most evident in smiling views.
Chins don’t match and don’t look alike either.
Eyes don’t match in orbits and lids.
Pupil distance proportions don’t match.
Forehead proportions don’t match.
Nose length and width proportions don’t match.
Brow ridges don’t match.
With the exception of the ears, these are all based on the bones, the infrastructure of the face. If they don’t match, it’s not the same person. Period. And I would rule out a match based on ears alone, but the overwhelming number of non-matches back that up.

Great work CrisisActorsGuild.com! And a big thank you to Joelle Steele for her assistance.

Freedom of Information Commission Orders Release of Dash Cams showing Sandy Hook Evacuation.

Freedom of Information Commission Orders Release of Dash Cams showing Sandy Hook Evacuation.

"I think the unspoken bottom line is CSP's desire to prevent harm to Newtown families by releasing more Sandy Hook related documents is in direct conflict with Connecticut's extensive freedom of information laws." - Sandy Hook Facts

In an appeal brought by the leader of the Sandy Hook hoaxer conspiracy theorists, Wolfgang Halbig, Connecticut's Freedom of Information Commission has ordered Connecticut State Police (Dept. of Emergency Services) to release Dash Cam videos from the patrol cars assigned to Newtown Officers Seabrook, Lt. Sinko, Chapman, and Sgt. Bahamonde from 12-14-12, the date of the elementary school massacre.   CSP had seized copies of those videos as part of their Sandy Hook Investigation.  The "original" videos are digital and still in the possession of Newtown.

Mert Melfa covered the hearing:
https://youtu.be/OzCAgaG95dc

CSP refused to release the Seabrook and Sinko DVDs even though those videos were already released via Newtown FOI Request and are publicly available.

The Chapman and Bahamonde videos have not been released to the public and have only been viewed publicly by a few select members of the press.  Those two videos, if released unredacted, show extensive evacuation of children from the north east corner of the school.  Most children were evacuated from the north east exit.  

Newtown had refused to release the Bahamonde and Chapman videos to Sandy Hook Facts claiming a "minor's identity" exemption to the FOIA Law.   Interestingly, CSP did not attempt to argue that exemption applied versus Halbig.

Sandy Hook Facts will be seeking to obtain the dash cams from CSP if they are released to Halbig.

Wolfgang Halbig also sought the sworn statements of several Newtown officers.   Release of Newtown Police statements was denied based on Connecticut's "witness exemption" the FOIA law.

After Sandy Hook, Newtown Officers gave witness statements to Connecticut State Police Investigators. Summaries of these statements were released in the final report. Frankly, it seems kind of a stretch to apply a "witness statement exemption" to officer statements.  Taking that argument to it's logical conclusion, anytime Connecticut would want to keep an officer statement from public release, they could simply have CSP Investigators take the  statement and instant exemption!  That is somewhat of a stretch of transparency and public policy for public officials.   Halbig could appeal that ruling.

A couple of fly's in Halbig's victory soup.

CSP will likely appeal. CSP claimed the ruling in Altimari concerning property seized from Lanza's home somehow  applies to police dash cams. The Commission did not buy off on that argument and it is doubtful that argument would prevail in court as it is absurd and again defeats public policy on transparency in releasing police Dash Cams.  Frankly, the courts have consistently ordered police videos released and I don't think the courts are going to change course here bases on CSP's weak arguments.

It is conceivable Newtown could intervene on behalf of their town minors and potentially move to block the release on that basis.  Unfortunately, Newtown seems paralyzed when it comes to filings to protect Newtown's children from hoaxers. Let us hope that changes soon.

CSP could possibly heavily redact and obscure the Dash Cams on their own prior to their release, as they did with the dash cams released with the Sandy Hook Final Report.  CSP released three of their several dash cams in December 2013. All 3 downloadable dash cam videos were heavily redacted and provided in horrible quality.

If the videos are actually released, the Bahamonde and Chapman videos could silence a few Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists who say there was no evacuation that day.

No Halbig circus this time
As to the hearing itself, Kay Wilson appeared for Halbig.  Halbig did not appear thus sparing us the unprofessional  "Bad monkey in the zoo" sideshow he typically puts on. We had no children or families intimidated; we had no outbursts; no tantrums; no running around in circles. No rubber duck nonsense or blowing his nose on Sandy Hook type shirts. No reports of filming of children at elementary schools. Without Halbig's incessant tantrums and childish interruptions, Kay Wilson was actually able to present a lucid, intelligent, and well thought out argument.  I actually agreed with most of her arguments.