Lenny Pozner's historic crushing legal defeat of James Fetzer just got real

Jim Fetzer's second home could become the property of Lenny Pozner.

    A hearing has been set where it is anticipated Lenny Pozner will acquire James Fetzer's second home to compensate a small portion of just debt he owes Lenny

    Let that sink in. James Fetzer's flock of lies could finally cost him because real property could be seized by the sheriff and handed to Lenny; a hearing on that issue is set for June 11, 2020.

    A brief recap of Lenny's total legal victory over James Fetzer is as follows:

Jim Fetzer and his Sandy Hook Hoaxers

    For years, hoaxers like James Fetzer openly used demonstrably false statements to bolster their claim that Sandy Hook was hoax. They did so not to "asking questions" but for financial gain and internet fame.  Jim Fetzer as a hoaxer; hoaxes people with fabrication into believing his position then pockets the cash with book sales while basking in his notoriety.

"Raise their right hand"
    The hoaxers also raised money pretending that if they got a Sandy Hook victim into court, they would get him or her to "raise their right hand" and they would use their "evidence" to prove Sandy Hook was a hoax.    Well the hoaxers did succeed at getting themselves into court; however, that was their only legal success.  Lawsuit losses and jail riddle the hoaxer ranks. The likes of hoaxers Jonathan Reich, "Sidethorn and Granny" jailed.  Wolfgang Halbig has the distinction of getting put in jail and being destroyed in lawsuits.  Fetzer, thus far, has narrowly avoided handcuffs; but that may soon change.

"Hoaxer evidence"
    As this blog as repeatedly proven, most hoaxer "evidence" is blatantly fabricated and/or photoshopped.  The rest isn't "evidence" at all. It is supposition, delusion, and wide-eyed fantasy.   As this blog wrote November, 2015 of Jim Fetzer's book:  

"There is not a single piece of evidence of hoax in the entire book. Literally, not one real fact that would lead a reasonable person to even consider hoax. Not one." https://www.sandyhookfacts.com/2015/11/jim-fetzer-and-james-tracy-profit-off.html

Lenny Pozner grew tired of Jim Fetzer's constant vicious lies and in November 2018, he filed a lawsuit in Jim Fetzer's own backyard, Dane County, Wisconsin.

Documents available:
     Most relevant documents on the Lenny's legal destruction of Fetzer can be found on this website: https://www.poznervfetzer.com/

     It should be noted that in the course of these court proceedings, Lenny offered mountains of real evidence: certified birth certificates,certified death certificates and reports, DNA evidence, the deposition of Dr. Carver and other real experts, and his own deposition.  Lenny raised his right hand.

Fetzer, for his part, completely failed to offer any evidence whatsoever to rebut Lenny's mountain of proof.  His attempts to beguile the court with looped youtube videos, lies, and irrational claims of a "Lenny impostor" were simply laughable and the court would have none of it.

No trial of fact needed
The court found that was not even a single trialable issue of fact.  No argument that Jim Fetzer had offered was even worth a trial or further court consideration. Not one.   The court granted total summary judgement on every point made by Lenny except one; the amount of money Jim Fetzer would be paying Lenny Pozner.

See Lenny's "Proposed Undisputed Facts" https://www.poznervfetzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/20190430-Plaintiffs-PPUF.pdf

The court found:

....Defendant Fetzer and Defendant Palecek defamed Plaintiff by publishing the following statements in the 2016 edition of NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK:

“Noah Pozner’s death certificate is a fake, which we have proven on a dozen or more grounds.”
“[Mr. Pozner] sent her a death certificate, which turned out to be a fabrication.”
“As many Sandy Hook researchers are aware, the very document Pozner circulated in
2014, with its inconsistent tones, fonts, and clear digital manipulation, was clearly a forgery.”
Plaintiff’s Motion additionally sought Summary Judgment that Defendant Fetzer defamed
Plaintiff by publishing the following statement from a 2018 blog post:
“It [N.P.’s death certificate] turned out to be a fabrication, with the bottom half of a real
death certificate and the top half of a fake, with no file number and the wrong estimated
time of death at 11 AM, when ‘officially’ the shooting took place between 9:35-9:40 that morning.”

https://www.poznervfetzer.com/order-granting-plaintiffs-motion-for-summary-judgment/

How much money, that's the question
Next, Jim Fetzer got his chance before a jury. The only issue before the jury was money. How much money Fetzer owed.  Again, Fezter completely failed. On October 15, 2019, the jury awarded Lenny Pozner $450,000. After costs, the amount awarded was $457,395.13.
https://www.poznervfetzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/bill-of-costs-judgement-pozner-v-fetzer.pdf

But ole' Jimmy Fetzer did not stop there.  Highlights of Jim Fetzer's continuing tremendous hoaxer fail in this trial include:

Appeal lost
 Fetzer's appeal was tossed; in part for stupidly and illegally using an unlicensed hoaxer as an "attorney":  -  https://www.poznervfetzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/348.-Decision-Order_12-12-2019.pdf

Another appeal may be pending; doubtless that will be lost.

Jail for Contempt
Jim Fetzer was found in contempt for violating the Court's orders and given five days jail.  His five days in jail was stayed if he paid Lenny $7,000.  Unfortunately, Fetzer chickened out and paid the money so we did not get a Fetzer perp walk we all deserve to see.
https://www.poznervfetzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/James-Fetzer-Contempt-Order-.pdf

Restraining Order
A permanent injunction was issued preventing Fetzer from repeating his lies at issue in this trial. Is it wrong to enjoy the fact Fetzer, with the help of his "friends" continue to violate the court order and Fetzer just might find himself in jail?
https://www.poznervfetzer.com/order-granting-permanent-injunction/


More Fetzer fail is to come
 Briefing is ongoing for  further contempt, sanctions, and attorney fees.
A second contempt proceeding is being brief whereby Fetzer is again facing more possible jail time:
https://www.poznervfetzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Pozner-Vs-Fetzer-DOC387.pdf

Attorney fees could approach a million dollars; however, that is an ongoing undecided matter.

Real property to go to Lenny
In a few days, Fetzer's second property is on the chopping block to help pay some of the money Fetzer owes Lenny. This is historic in that it would be the first real property taken from a hoaxer for their mountain of lies.

Doubtless, it will not be the last.

The People versus Wolfgang W. Halbig

*World Wide Exclusive*
The People versus Wolfgang Halbig
**The case- Proving it up**
Florida Attorney Caleb Payne's connection to the arrest

As has been widely reported, Wolfgang Halbig is facing charges related to distributing the detailed personal information of Lenny Pozner; including his driver's license number, social security number, etc.  Halbig has engaged in this activity for years. In fact, a calling card of the hoaxer is "doxing" Sandy Hook victims personal information.

The probable cause statement for the arrest of Wolfgang Halbig details that Wolfgang Halbig also sent the "full and comprehensive TLOxp report about victim Pozner" to others.

Probable Cause for arrest  #7

In mid 2018, SandyHookFacts received the original Wolfgang Halbig email string with attached comprehensive TLOxp of Lenny Pozner.   This is the same report as the one at issue in the arrest and Probable Cause #7 above.

The email string was a series of emails between Wolfgang Halbig and Caleb Payne. Ultimately, Halbig forwarded this email string to countless others.  One of those was Newtown's infamous "Vlad", of duckgate fame, who forwarded the email to me.   I promptly forwarded the email to Lenny.

To be clear, Lenny has been dealing with Halbig and his hoaxers distributing his report and information since 2014 and the arrest of Halbig comes via that route; not this blog or information provided TO Lenny by Sandy Hook Facts.

There is substantial evidence of law breaking by numerous hoaxers; that is beyond the scope of this blog and certainly no credit should be applied in this direction.

First, before anyone claims there is some attorney-client privilege between Caleb Payne and Wolfgang; Wolfgang waived that when he forwarded this email to untold numbers of people. There is nothing secret here.  Caleb, additionally, knew or should know Halbig sends everything out and that Halbig has screwed over every attorney he has used.

With Halbig's propensity to forward every email he gets to government offices and considering the ongoing lawsuit discovery,: if you have ever emailed Wolfgang, lawyers and law enforcement probably have that.

If you are one of Halbig's evil minions, bent on harassing victims, you may soon have the knock on your door.

As a result of Caleb assisting Halbig, Halbig's and his hoard of hoaxer minions were enabled. They were posting the Lenny report online and emailing it to untold numbers of people with the intent and purpose of harassing families of the Sandy Hook tragedy.

I know Lenny would like to see more charges brought against Halbig's conspirators, so I will not name more of them or go into that further in this blog.   Let us hope his co-conspirators soon get a knock on the door at 1 am from the police and a mugshot photo.

As to the email string, attached to the email was an invoice and email from "Right Way Consulting" billing hoaxer attorney Caleb Payne $100 for "Pozner Research". The "research" was the 187 page "comprehensive" TLOxp report on Leonard Pozner.  Wolfgang Halbig promptly forwarded Caleb's email to hoaxer "Dorothy Hill" with the message "Here is what you requested".




Email from Right Way Consulting to Caleb Payne:

Here, Wolfgang is requesting Caleb Payne confirm Caleb would be his attorney (in the Pozner v. Halbig case).  Caleb ultimately represented Halbig pro bono for a portion of that case. That case was dismissed after Halbig fully complied in removing Pozner's personal information from his website.

Wolfgang to Caleb Payne: "Can you please send me an email that you are going to be my attorney. It will make me sleep better at night".  Caleb, obviously, had the goal of helping Halbig sleep cozy at night while giving Halbig the tools to harass a Sandy Hook victim.



It is no wonder Caleb would be a part of this and would obtain Pozner's report for Halbig.

Obviously Caleb knew or should know what Halbig and his minions would do with the report because Halbig does what he and his hoaxers have done for years, hurt victims of Sandy Hook.

And while Caleb Payne is not directly responsible for the criminal actions of Wolfgang Halbig, reasonable people do not give a well known hoaxer conspiracy theorist like Wolfgang Halbig reports on Sandy Hook victims.

Why would Caleb Payne not use reasonable prudence with the report and his privileges as an attorney?

Well, in an online interview with Dave Gahary (a co-defendant when Pozner sued Jim Fetzer), attorney Caleb Payne exposed himself as a fellow wide eyed irrational conspiracy theorist hoaxer when he openly questioned whether crisis actors were used at the Pulse Nightclub shooting.   Here is the relevant portion of that interview:

Payne went so far as to pay $100 to get Wolfgang a report on Leonard Pozner. A report that had NOTHING to do with the case versus Pozner.

So why would he? Payne should answer that question. Preferably in handcuffs and disbarred, but that is just opinion and hope.

An email Halbig forwarded from Caleb Payne to Wolfgang Halbig

The Invoice from Right Way Consulting to Caleb Payne for $100 for "Pozner Research" - ie the TLOxp Report mentioned in the arrest affidavit.

                                          

A screen capture of the actual report itself.

The report is 187 pages long:

It is worth noting that the one who pulled the report very well could be in violation of the law and terms:

My email forwarding this Caleb Payne email string to Lenny:

A screen capture of the attachments Wolfgang Sent - Lenny's report and Caleb Payne's invoice.

The origianl email from Caleb Payne to Wolfgang Halbig containing the report.

Wolfgang Halbig files false affidavits into Federal Court as Defendant's lose ground

UPDATE:  Alex Jones cites the false affadavit in his latest motion:  http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=15824514

Wolfgang Halbig is desperate to get out of the Connecticut lawsuit brought by Sandy Hook families.  Sandy Hook Families are currently suing Alex Jones, Wolfgang Halbig, and Cory Sklanka for their defamation and other harm.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/04/17/heres-why-sandy-hook-parents-and-others-are-suing-alex-jones/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d54b1411d769

Wolfgang Halbig  is a prominent public figure hoaxer leader who claim the Sandyhook shootings were a government hoax. Hoaxers g nerally claim the families were “crisis actors” who are lying about losing their children and family for profit, fame , and to take people’s guns.

One of Halbig main goals is to create distance between himself and Cory Sklanka, aka "Sleight of Sin".  With Cory Sklanka in the case, the Federal Court has no diversity jurisdiction and the case will be heard in Connecticut state court.  Alex Jones is even citing Halbig's false affidavits as their "proof" hoping to prove Sklanka was "fraudulently joined".

Unfortunately for Halbig and Jones, Cory Sklanka very publicly worked with Wolfgang Halbig and in fact, during the time in question, acted as Wolfgang Halbig's agent to the FOIA Commission and direct adviser to Wolfgang Halbig.

 This can be proven because Sklanka himself filmed some of his Halbig work and posted it online.  In fact, it's still available on hoaxer channels!

Despite the readily available proof, Wolfgang Halbig has filed an affidavit stating "I did not know Mr. Sklanka at the time" (of the hearing).  Here is the relevant portion (document in full below).

In the above statement Wolfgang is refusing to attend any hearing where the Plaintiffs would play a video proving Halbig's previous affidavit was false.  I don't blame him. That would be embarrassing for Halbig.    Previously, Halbig had told the court that Cory Sklanka "did not operate any camera; he did not have a camera; he has never touched a camera in my presence."  He also claimed Sklanka did not "co-host any broadcasts with me."

Wolfgang can rest easy because there will not be a hearing; the Court already ruled against him; citing in part, the fact that Halbig's claims had been rebutted.  Order for Remand.  Halbig's first affidavit is discussed by the Court on Page 10 of the Order.

Cory Sklanka - Camera Person

In the screen capture from the April 24, 2015 hearing Cory can be seen operating the camera and talking with another Sandy Hook Justice member, Jonathan Reich.    From left to right are  Cory Sklanka with headphones operating a camera rig;  Dan Bidondi of Infowars with Camera rig; Jonathan Reich wearing a baseball cap, and Wolfgang Halbig, staring straight at Sklanka. Halbig is sitting next to his long time attorney, L. Kay Wilson.  Wolfgang's claim Cory "never operated a camera" is completely false.

Short video clip of Cory Sklana, Jonathan Reich, and Dan Bidondi working during Halbig's 2015 hearing. Sklanka is clearly operating a camera with live stream phone attached to the tripod.

Cory Sklanka - Agent of Wolfgang Halbig to the Commission

Wolfgang Halbig is claiming he did not know Cory Sklanka during the April 2015 hearing. In reality, Cory Sklanka met with the FOIA Commission on March 30, 2015 and explicitly claimed to be acting on behalf of Wolfgang Halbig and as Wolfgang Halbig's agent before that state agency. Sklanka was working on behalf of Wolfgang Halbig because the Commission had continued Halbig's March 2015 hearing and Halbig was throwing a tantrum.    Sklanka's entire purpose at the FOIA Office was Halbig, Halbig's concerns, and Halbig's case.

The day after the hearing, Wolfgang Halbig, in a broadcast with Sklanka (aka SOS, Sleight of Sin), discussed the advice he received from Sklanka BEFORE THE HEARING.

Here are short video clips disproving Halbig's claim that he "did not know Mr. Sklanka".

Cory Sklanka - Co-Host of Wolfgang's Sandy Hook Justice
Cory Sklanka, in fact, co-hosted the November 15, 2015 Sandy Hook Justice report titled "Sandy Hook Justice Report with special guest James Hastings - November 15, 2015 - Episode 2"
The video has been removed from Youtube; however, it has been archived as evidence.

Perjury before the Court
The fact is, perjury is a crime.  Wolfgang claims he did not know Cory Sklanka prior to 4/24/15, among many other statements regarding his relationship with Cory Sklanka, are demonstrably false.  The authorities should investigate to determine if Halbig committed a crime.

It remains to be seen if Cory Sklanka and Alex Jones are going to continue to support Halbig's false affidavits.


More detailed information is below.

Sandy Hook Parents sue Alex Jones for Defamation

***BREAKING NEWS***

Lenny Pozner has sues Alex Jones for defamation. 

*UPDATE* Full pdf complaints here:
Lenny Pozner, et al versus Alex Jones, et al
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Infowars.2.pdf

Neil Heslin versus Alex Jones, et al
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/InfoWars.1.pdf



Lenny Pozner, Veronique Dela Rosa, and Neil Heslin have filed suit against Alex Jones for his vicious attacks on them in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting!

Alex Jones is the father of "crisis actor hoaxing" people into believing mass shootings are fake or in some cases, false flags.  There has never been a single piece of real evidence that any civilian mass shooting has ever been faked; therefore, Alex Jones comments are also malicious.  He makes them to intentionally harm and spread false information.

Alex Jones makes money defaming the memory of
those slain during shooting rampages by pushing the hoax/false flag narratives

SandyHookFacts.com can EXCLUSIVELY reveal that the real reason Alex Jones was crying was NOT the Syrian air strike, was likely because Lenny Pozner's law firm had just served Alex Jones with a demand letter, demanding Alex Jones retract his false statements!

Alex Jones' Malicious Lies
One major malicious lie Alex Jones tells is that Anderson Cooper's interview with Veronique was done in front of a "blue screen".  Alex Jones makes this claim, among others, to discredit the victims families and thus, spread doubt about the shooting itself.   Alex Jones goes so far as to claim expertise as proof that Veroniqe was using a blue screen. Alex Jones lies work and he hoaxers people into thinking Sandy Hook was a "FEMA drill" for gun control!  Alex Jones hoaxer lies are bread and butter gospel to the hoaxer!

In truth, Anderson Cooper has explained that he was in New York, about an hour away. After news broke, he went to Newtown and did the interview on location.  Obviously, setting up a blue screen would have been ridiculous.

This, and several other lies told by Alex Jones was covered  by Sandy Hook Facts in this video:

Alex Jones Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Debunked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IMmdByGPe0

Alex Jones tells his lies to cast doubt on the shooting and make people who lost their children look like liars!

Obviously, Texas, like most states, has a one year statute of limitations on defamation and Alex Jones has been telling his lies for years.
Alex Jones is Hoaxer Zero, as covered here:
Alex Jones Sandy Hook Hoax Founder - Hoaxer Zero
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGP1vSvyMG0

When Alex Jones went on Megyn Kelly's program, he reiterated his same lies as in the past, this arguably reset the statute of limitations!

We should have full details of the lawsuit soon.

Sandy Hook Facts debunked Alex Jones' Megyn Kelly interview in two videos:

Alex Jones Megyn Kelly Interview 

Alex Doubles Down on his lies

Alex Jones lied about Sandy Hook to Megyn Kelly

Sandy Hook Facts can finally reveal what really made Alex Jones cry!  He had just received notice of intent to sue!

Alex Jones debunked!

Pulse Survivor Angel Colon sues over Robin Weigel's attack videos "HowISeetheWorld"

Sandy Hook Hoaxer Robin Weigel aka "HowISeeWorld" and "HowISeeSandyHook" has made countless videos defaming, making threats, making racist comments, not to mention actually contacting, stalking, and harassing many victims of high profile violent crime. Many victims have fallen prey to this armed, violence preaching monster.   In addition to targeting Sandy Hook Victims  Robin Weigel targeted many survivors of the Pulse Night Club shooting.

One is fighting back!  Angel Colon is suing over a video made by Robin. Robin attacked Angel Colon as Angel was in the hospital recuperating from his gunshot wounds after the Pulse Night Club Shooting. Robin, using a ruse that he was "Angel's friend", called him and recorded the call. Robin then goes on a tirade defaming the victim.  This was covered by SandyHookFacts this blog as part of an article on Robin's partner, Wolfgang Halbig.
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/06/orlando-shooting-hoax-fundraising-by.html

SandyHookFacts.com has been very active supporting the Pulse Night Club victims and helping to defend them from attacks by Hoaxers.
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/06/orlando-shooting-hoax-claims-and.html

Sandy Hook Facts stands with Orlando Pulse victims

I covered Robin's call to Angel Colon as part of my video "Racist Rager targets Erica Lafferty":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahp_IURVHaE

I covered the fact that Sandy Hook hoaxer co-conspiractors created an account impersonating Angel Colon in this article:
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/09/dismissal-sought-in-jonathan-reich-vs.html

The lawsuit discusses Robin Weigel's video; however, The John Doe's named are "MaxResistance.com" (owned and operated by several well known Sandy Hook Hoax Group Members) and TruthMedia Revolution.

Republisher TruthMediaRevolution's video with over 58,000 views can be seen here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to4LPCgcP5A

Robin's original video, currently not named in the lawsuit, can be found here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FATxueGJclQ



Certainly, many Sandy Hook Hoax group members would be appropriate defendants as they conspire with Robin to defame, harass, and stalk victims. Robin Weigel is a fundraising shill for Sandy Hook Hoax group causes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp7fZnyOmAs

The lawsuit refers to Robin's video as "John Doe". Apparently, Angel does not know his attacker's name. That means he does not know Robin is a California resident. Robin often records calls without consent. This is a direct violation of California law and Robin could and should do jail time! He also harasses people in violation of California law.  California prosecutes many for this crime every year and certainly Robin Weigel would should appropriately face justice and get his day in criminal court.

The lawsuit anticipates it will exceed $75,000:

My video where I showed this attack on Angel Colon: "Racist rager targets Erica Lafferty".

SandyHookFacts.com will closely monitor this case.

Here  is the complaint:

Sandy Hook Hoaxer Trial Updates

"Reich is still showing as having no motions filed by his public defender. This would seem to indicate that hoaxer leaders Wolfgang Halbig and Tony Mead still have not helped Jonathan Reich, despite raising nearly $100,000 promising to help Reich with his case." - SandyHookFacts.com

Let's do a brief update on the hoaxers on trial or in the court system.

Hoaxers have presented ZERO evidence of hoax.
First, my challenge still stands unanswered. With so many hoaxers facing the court system, as listed below, I challenged all hoaxer conspiracy theorists to present even one court admissible piece of evidence of hoax to help all their pals facing the court system.  I was nice enough to allow them to provide evidence of hoax of any mass shooting in the USA.

The challenge was nearly rhetorical.  I am fully aware hoaxers do not have a single piece of court admissible evidence of hoax, despite their years of digging. That is amazing considering they contend tens of thousands of people are "in on it".

Their photoshopped memes, looped videos, and outright lies have no factual foundation and thus would be flatly rejected in court.

To date, not a single hoaxer or hoaxer leader, to include Jim Fetzer, Wolfgang Halbig, Jim Fetzer, or James Tracy, has stepped up and provided even one piece of court admissible evidence of hoax that could help themselves or their followers in court.

Let that sink in. Some of the biggest names in Hoaxerism have active cases; not one piece of evidence has been present.   James Tracy, Jonathan Reich, Wolfgang Halbig - where is the evidence of hoax?

Do you know that when I beat Wolfgang Halbig in court to the tune of about $25,000, he provided zero evidence of hoax.

Where is the evidence, hoaxers?

Now the update.

Jonanthan Reich, Wolfgang Halbig, and Lenny Pozner plus other Legal Updates

A quick update on the current cases

New York vs Jonathan Reich - extradition proceedings
Jonathan Reich is currently remanded and will remain in jail until an extradition hearing on December 19, 2016.

Reich still shows as represented by Legal Aid, so apparently Sandy Hook Justice has not ponied up the dough they collected to help "Jonathan Reich bring down Connecticut" with his court battle.

Connecticut vs. Jonathan Reich
Still wanted by Connecticut with valid warrant for his arrest.


Jonathan Reich vs Patch.com
See video update of Patch.com's filing to dismiss Reich's case here.

The matter is set for Dismissal Motion on 12-5-16 at 10:00 am.

What to expect:  The court will hear arguments and likely take the motion under submission. We would probably get a ruling in about 30 days.

Leonard Pozner vs Wolfgang Halbig
Hearing at Lake County Courts December 13, 2016 at 9:15

Wolfgang Halbig's attorney left the case and Halbig is proceeding without an attorney.  The saying "A person who represents themselves has a fool for a client" is no truer than it is here. Halbig filed an untimely Motion to Dismiss, which was effectively a demurer and filed after the answer.  Lenny's attorney responded asking to strike the motion and award attorney fees for the frivolous filing.

This is a no-brainer slam dunk for Attorney Fees for Lenny Pozner.

Wolfgang Halbig currently owes Sandy Hook Facts over $25,000 in attorney fees and $1,000 in reward money (CrisisActorsGuild.com may have a legitimate claim to that reward money as well).



Wolfgang Halbig Freedom of Information Requests
No appeal is currently found from the State of Connecticut regarding the Dash Cam Videos.  Is it possible Halbig will actually get the videos?  This remains to be seen...

Recent FOIA losses:
Wolfgang Halbig was denied school records of the Sandy Hook School choir.

Wolfgang Halbig has spent thousands and thousands of dollars to chasing after these children.  It is quite concerning.  He recently put the Police Chief on notice he was moving to Newtown to find the children.


Altamari FOI Appeal
This is an appeal seeking copies of documents seized from the Sandy Hook shooter's residence. The case is still pending with no significant activity to report.

Jonathan Reich vs Patch.com lawsuit hopes to carve new exception to Statute of Limitations

"The mainstream media has neglected their duties and refused to report on a case of national attention" - HartfordCommunityCourt.com admitting Jonathan Reich's public interest status based on their  "pro-Jonathan Reich" website, an entire web blog dedicated to the Jonathan Reich criminal prosecution by Connecticut. 

Jonathan Reich is suing Patch.com (Reich v. Patch Media, Charles C. Hale et al) for Defamation and other defamation linchpinned claims .

Patch.com struck back with a powerful motion to dismiss response, which among other things, pleads that the suit is years past statute of limitations, as was covered here:
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/09/dismissal-sought-in-jonathan-reich-vs.html

As a side note, SandyHookFacts.com was disturbed to learn that one of Sandy Hoax Group's racist shills was launching fundraiser drives for Jonathan Reich while, apparently, speaking with Reich himself.  When Robin, aka "HowISeetheworld" is not calling for attacks of government officials, he is anti-American racist Nazi who rails about his hatred of Jews on near daily basis.  SandyHookFacts.com finds Robin's racism disgusting and nauseating.   You can listen to some his vitriol and antisemitic tirade here:

Reich's motion was originally set for October; however, Patch.com attorneys agreed with Reich's request to postpone the motion for further pleadings.

On the deadline day, Jonathan Reich finally responded to  Patch.com's motion to dismiss.

I'm going to offer a few thoughts on the pleading.

Wilder's alleged failure to communicate with Defendant
To begin the pleading, Reich's attorney, Nick Wilder, rages for three pages about how his alleged illness was the cause of his failure to respond to Patch.com attorney's after filing suit.

Rather than risk contact from one of Mr. Wilder's nephrlogists, SHF will just move on from that issue and wish him the best in his continued recovery from "illness" and such.  I doubt the court will entertain the "he said / no he said" issue at all. The case is on track and whether Wilder was really too sick to to take five minutes to reply is really moot now.

Wilder then conflates a Motion to Dismiss and a motion for Summary Judgement. This is all nonsense; however, if Reich clears the Statute hurdle, the case would likely at least proceed to discovery.


Statute of Limitations
It is simple. New York has a one year statute of limitations. The articles were written over three years ago. Done, right?

 The lawsuit appeared frivolous; however,  Reich attorney appears to be attempting trying to carve himself out a brand new exception to the statute of limitations.  Buried in his pleading is just a few nonspecific paragraphs on the subject.

In short, it appears Reich will argue that the creation of a slippery slope is in order, and that each time Patch.com created a new subdomain for itself, it was a republication of the original link, and thus restarting the statute of limitations.  To support their argument, they rely on the above case where the appeals court specifically did not rule on that issue.

Reich is hoping to set a new precedent that would allow him to hurdle the statute of limitations for defamation; almost negating the statue itself when applied to large news websites.    If the court did find that this action by Patch.com was a republication, it could rule the lawsuit may proceed.

 It also means the court could bag out of this case easily by simply rejecting Reich's argument, dismissing the case, and letting it go die on appeal.  That appears to be the most logical route the court would go.

It seems reasonable the court would offer the parites some time to present their argument before ruling on Patch's motion to dismiss.

No case against the reporters individually
Also note that Reich sued reporters, such as Jessie Sawyer, individually. It doesn't seem Reich is even attempting to present an argument to support a cause of action against the reporters individually and as to those allegations, Reich will surely lose.

No examples given
Wilder intentionally did not provide any examples of republication in his pleading; so whether Plaintiff's even have a legitimate example of republication remains to be seen.

Either way, that is a matter of law the court will decide and that makes the ruling anyone's guess.  It does appear this case could offer further fundraising opportunity as it will likely drag on for several months.

Sandy Hook Facts.com will closely look at the merits of the case if Reich hurdles the time bar; however, don't expect to be impressed with the case.  The pleading is as weak as you have come to expect from other hoaxer lawsuits.

Reich alleges gems such as:

 "Malicious intent is found when publishing witness names and details not
authorized to be published according to Avon Police Department procedures, and
through the controlled release of pre-written articles."

So we would need to believe courts must gauge itself on Avon Police procedures and whether those police procedures restrain our first amendment protected press?  The court will roll it's eyes over such nonsense.

Want another?

“the article published on 5/22/2013 claimed that Plaintiff made ‘threatening calls’ to the Chief Medical examiner” and the “statement falsely claims as a factual matter that Mr. Reich ‘harassed’ Dr. Carver”

The article is here and it claims no such thing:
http://patch.com/connecticut/farmington/ct-chief-medical-examiner-received-threatening-calls-referencing-newtown-shooting-probe

More outrageously, Reich is presently a fugitive from justice and Connecticut has a warrant out for his arrest for $100,000 on that very case.

Can a fugitive sue for defamation while hiding from answering the charges of Connecticut? That is an interesting legal question!

Hoaxers themselves admit Reich's case is of national interest
Most importantly, Reich completely forgets his status as a public figure by virtue of the fact he is involved in a prosecution of public interest.  The people have a First Amendment right to discuss cases, especially those of "national interest."

Aside from the fact Reich himself is going on international radio programs such as John Wells, Reich's own supporters create websites dedicated solely to his case:

Reich's people call his cases deserving of "national attention", and they even call the press themselves to ask them to cover the story, according to the HartfordCommunityCourt website.  HartfordCommunityCourt.com is a ruse of a website that purports itself to be a legal blog when in reality it is site dedicated to spreading Reich's case throughout the interwebs.

Yet, Reich wants to sue when people they publicly discuss his case?  It appears Reich might want to fund raise off of people discussing his case while pressuring media not to discuss his case while his friends beg the media to cover the case.

You can't have it both ways, Jonny!  Reich just might want to read what his friends are publishing, Your case is public record and of national importance; in that I agree with the SandyHookJustice websites.  HartfordCommunityCourt has dozens of articles on Jonathan Reich (in fact, it is their sole reason for existence).   Hoaxers  bemoan the fact that main stream news are not covering it: "it is disheartening to see that journalists and loggers have refused to report.."   and "when the case is directly brought to the attention [of mainstream reporters], a blind eye was the response."

By stipulation, the Defendants have until Nov. 25 to respond and a conference is set for December 5.


So in closing, obviously, the lawsuit is bogus and littered with nonsense.   Cases such as this are why SandyHookFacts.com supports nationwide the SLAPP protections, such as those offered in SandyHookFacts jurisdiction, California.

You may download the court documents from New York's website https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASSearch?param=P - (Case # 156787/2016)



Small link: http://bit.ly/2fHbZ38 to this article

Sandy Hook - Legal Updates 10/16/16

This article covers updates on the following cases-
Soto et al vs Bushmaster et al - Dismissed
Lewis et al vs Newtown et al - Ongoing
Jonathan Reich vs Patch.com - Ongoing with dismissal motion 10/28/16 *
State of Connecticut  vs Jonathan Reich  - Reich is wanted with $100,000 warrant for his arrest.
Wolfgang Halbig vs John Doe bloggers - Halbig loss- on appeal
Wolfgang Halbig vs Errol Property - Halbig loss
Lenny Pozner versus Wolfgang Halbig - Ongoing
William Shanley's frivolous "trillion dollar" lawsuits - All dismissed. Appeals dismissed.
James Tracy vs. FAU - Ongoing

Update 10/24/16: Note on Reich vs Patch - The hearing for 10/24/16 was adjourned and Patch's motion for dismissed is scheduled for 10/28/16 at 10:00 am.

Sandy Hook Lawsuit Dismissed - versus Remington, Bushmaster, etc 

In national news right now is the dismissal of this case.

http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-sandy-hook-parents-lawsuit-dismissed-20161014-story.html

This lawsuit boiled down to the federal gun manufacturer shield law and that law prevailed.  This blog has published the opinion that the lawsuit would likely be dismissed due to the shield law (December 15, 2014).  The intent of that federal law is to shield gun companies from lawsuits such as this so long as the weapons work properly and were lawfully sold. At Sandy Hook, the legally purchased Bushmaster XM15 (AR-15 style weapon)  performed as designed and 20 children and 6 teachers were slaughtered in minutes. Therefore, the gun companies are shielded from liability.

The text of the 54 page decision may be read here:
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=11214676


The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Lawful_Commerce_in_Arms_Act

An appeal has been promised.

Sandy Hook Lawsuit versus Newtown
The Jesse Lewis estate and the Noah Pozner estate are suing Newtown alleging, essentially, negligence and failure to follow procedures at Sandy Hook School.

Most facts of the shooting itself are not at issue.
Shooter entered the school, first killing the principal (Daw Hochsprung) and the school psychologist (Mary Sherlach)


Allegation screen cap

Newtown's response:

The shooter then entered classrooms 8 and 10 and killed 20 

The case is still pending.

Jonathan Reich vs Patch.com

Jonathan Reich's lawsuit versus the Patch is still pending. Patch.com has filed a motion to dismiss due to a clearly exceeded statute of limitations. That motion is currently set for 10/24/16.  Hoaxers are still using the lawsuit to shill for fundraising dollars while intentionally failing to tell their cult members that the statue of limitations expired in 2014.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASMain

Case # 156787/2016

State of Connecticut  vs Jonathan Reich

Entire Case and motions on hold.  Jonathan Reich is wanted with a $100,000 warrant for his arrest for Failing to appear in court.