Sandy Hook Hoax Completely Debunked - Ten Comprehensive Proofs hoax is a complete fraud

"It's well past time people begin demanding Alex Jones, James Fetzer, Wolfgang Halbig, James Tracy, Maria Chang, Tony Mead, and the rest of the hoaxers explain the demonstrably false claims they push as true." 



 Sandy Hook Hoax has not only been debunked, it has been proven to be pushed with fraudulent intent. That is to say that in many cases, it can be demonstrated the the pushers of the information are knowingly pushing false information.    This article shows the top ten proofs the claim that "Sandy Hook was a hoax" is nothing but a fraud.

    One must first understand that there is not a single piece of court admissible evidence of hoax for any mass shooting in the USA, ever.  There has never been a single piece of evidence of hoax produced and there has never been a whistle blower.

   In this article I will present the top ten proofs Sandy Hook hoax is not only completely debunked, the memes pushed are total fakery.

Proof 1: Misrepresenting and manipulating videos"Everyone must check in" & "Walking in Circles"

From Alex Jones to nearly every hoax video published, two videos are used to hook people into believing hoax. Both videos are knowingly and fraudulently represented by the Sandy Hook hoax leadership as they are aware the videos have long been debunked.

Gene Rosen's interview in the front the "Everyone Must Check-In" sign is core hoaxer lore. The hoaxers use it to suggest that the sign is proof of a drill on the morning of the shooting, directing the "participants" to check in before the shooting.

"Everyone must check" debunked as fraudulent
Everyone must check in" was debunked as fraudulent by CW Wade on March 24, 2014; a debunking that sent shock waves through the hoaxer community. Their tricks had been outted!  It was also when CW Wade really began to realize hoaxers were not simply misguided researchers; they are fakes intentionally falsifying their claims.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLNJ5nWBvug

The trickery is obvious. The interview with Gene Rosen in front of the flashing sign was conducted days after the shooting; yet the hoaxers snip the video or push the photo to represent that the sign was there on the morning of the shooting, Friday. That is false. It was delivered to help control the press late Saturday or early Sunday.

The sign was not there Friday morning and had nothing to do with a "drill".  here is one photo from Friday morning. 

News Chopper footage clearly shows the sign is not present:

https://youtu.be/2gG9OWSXOQY?t=3m30s

Walking in Circles

    Another popular hoax video concept that is used to trick people into believing hoax is the claim that  "Everyone was walking in circles" at the fire house.  Alex Jones uses a modified and even more fraudulent version of the claim; falsely stating the "kids are walking in circles".

   The fraud was exposed when it was proven the hoaxers looped the video, added "going in circles music", and photoshopped arrows.  A total fakery!

The hoaxer video "We need to talk about Sandy Hook" pushed the theory as true, despite the fact the Nazi supporter Peter Klein (aka Tyranny News Network) looped the video 18 times in the film, while claiming authenticity!

 Alex Jones directly lied about this in his Megyn Kelly interview. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkV1b8Q0J60   Fraud on top of  fraud.

Sandy Hook FEMA Manual Debunked - Ten Proofs of Hoaxer Fraud

Sandy Hook FEMA Manual Debunked - Ten Proofs of Hoaxer Fraud

This video takes a look at the Sandy Hook FEMA manual that hoaxers began pushing on October 6, 2014.

I present ten proofs that the Sandy Hook FEMA Manual is a complete fraud.  Hoaxers are on notice that pushing this fake manual as part of fundraising schemes and products sales is fraud and a violation of Federal law.


Here is the video:

Ten Proofs of Fraud
Here is a link to the fake FEMA document on a neutral pdf hosting.

Aurora, Boston, Sandy Hook, Paris "Crying Crisis Actor" Debunked as a total fraud.

One of the many fraudulent claims by Sandy Hook Hoaxers is that Carlee Soto appears at numerous mass shootings as a "crisis actor". Conspiracy theorists repeat and parrot the meme ad nauseum throughout the internet.

Let's take a look at the latest "evidence" the hoaxers are using to show the Paris tragedy was a "government hoax".

First, the image itself.  As I was looking through the originals, looking for a decent size to compare, I noticed they were not even the same. The photo used by hoaxers has been manipulated

Here is the meme touted by hoaxers.

This is the original.

Manipulation & Hoaxer Fraud

 Actual Version

She is quite obviously not Carlee Soto (almost odd to have to say that).

Other's "Crying Girls" Debunked  - Amanda Madek ,  "Dark Knight Rising/Aurora, Colorado theaters shooting

Her sister Micaylah was murdered, thus causing Amanda to become a target.

In the hoaxer meme, the hoaxers intentionally mislabel Amanda Medek "Boston" in order to add to the deception and make it harder to track the original.

Amanda Madek came be to be slandered as a "crisis actor" and re-victimized after losing her sister in a horrific shooting just because she happens to be a brunette, and thus by Hoaxer "comparisons" she must be the "crisis actor" who also played Carlee Soto.  The hoaxers push this meme despite the fact she is obviously not Carlee Soto, as even a cursory image search reveals.   

This lady was photographed:

Emma MacDonald, Boston Bombing

At the time, a student at Boston University, Emma Macdonald is the third innocent lady victimized by hoaxers and declared a "crisis actor".  To add to the deception, she is intentionally mislabeled as "Aurora". She was photographed at a vigil and is easily found by cursory google search.  She bears no resemblance to Carlee Soto. 

She is easily researched as Emma MacDonald

.

Friend of Rachel Semplice, also pictured

 Emma MacDonald's Facebook Profile Picture

The Hoaxers are not investigators. They use deceptive manipulation and lies to deceive their followers into believing "hoaxer".

That is why they are called hoaxers.  They hoax their viewers and followers with false claims.

Sandy Hook Hoax Fraud - Original Flexfit Email Released

 Sandy Hook Hoax
Fabricated Evidence - Final Proof!
The original Flexfit email released.

Sandy Hook hoaxers were caught red-handed intentionally passing fake evidence.
A hoaxer fabricated an email that the Hoaxer Crew claimed to be from Flexfit and was used to attempt to show Adam Lanza's hat was not manufactured until 2013! It has turned out to be contrived evidence and Flexfit did not stand for it and set the record straight!


Catching Sandy Hook Hoax blatantly fabricating evidence has shocked all legitimate researchers.


Originally debunked here:


1. http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/08/sandy-hook-hoax-caught-manipulating.html


The flaws with the' fabrication of the Flexfit email was further detailed in a subsequent post.  While they hoaxer claimed the hat bore "numbers" (that apparently only she could see)  and those numbers could identify the purchaser of the hat.

2. http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/08/sandy-hook-hoax-perpetuates-their-fraud.html


3. See also Keith's Article here, which includes the audio of the phone call:
http://sandyhookstalkers.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/the-sandy-hook-flexfit-hoax/

There was one loose end that needed to be tied up to complete the debunking ,the "smoking gun".  

We needed the original email to prove Sandy Hook Hoax's underhanded scheme once and for all.

Keith Johnson stepped up to the plate and contacted Flexfit, speaking personally to the Vice President by phone and the VP agreed to help us put this to rest and to provide the original email that was recovered by Flexfit IT personnel.


Comparing the real email below, with Sandy Hook Hoax's fabricated version (bottom of post), you start to gain insight into the fraud that was attempted: .

 

A deleted post has been recovered from archives that shows Bridgett (aka Adam Babb) talking about the nonexistent serial numbers that she believes she can see on the ha.  There are no serial numbers on the hat, an easily observed fact:

Evidence Photo that she claims contains these secret numbers:

Sandy Hook Hoax Perpetuates their Fraud - Flexfit Bucket Hat

The Sandy Hook Hoax crew have been caught red handed manipulating evidence are desperately pulling out all the stops in an irrational attempt to carry on the charade.

Hoaxer:
"To me, it is the first concrete, indisputable evidence of the Report being fabricated"

Indisputable?


As reported by SandyHookFacts.com:
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/08/sandy-hook-hoax-caught-manipulating.html

The email is not only in dispute, it is proven to be modified to the extent that it is nothing but a phoney.


The hoaxer crew posted an email that purported to prove the bucket hat Adam Lanza wore in his attack on Sandy Hook Hoax Elementary School was made after 2013.  She alleged she obtained this information from an email from Flexfit that stated the sweatband in the hat was the new sweatband  and was not produced until 2013.

The Hoaxers ran with the story without doing a single bit of internet research or fact checking.   Soon, Flexfit's Vice President declared in the Hoaxer email was manipulated by the hoaxers, prior to posting it and changing what the employee had said.

Caught red-handed!

The Vice President's email further went on to detail that the new Flexfit sweatband, a band that did not go into production until a "running change in 2014".  The one shown in Lanza's photo was manufactured between 2005-2013, and was the old style.  A photo of the new headband was provided by Flexfit's VP and makes clear the difference.

New style sweatband

Crime Scene photo: old style sweatband

This is not the first time Hoaxers have been caught fraudulently inventing "evidence", and it wont be the last. Previous hoaxer fabrication of evidence includes the "Check-In Here Sign", "26 Christmas Trees", "Helicopter fly-over Time", and Camera.

This is the first time that we have documented it from the very moment they began their perpetration.

Lets take a close look at the' alleged email and look at online archived web evidence of the sweatband:

 First, the text of the email as posted by Bridget , taken from Jim Fetzer's

From: Leslie<leslie@flexfit.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: HELLO??
To: “Bridget”

Hello Bridget, Sorry for the delay in responding… I have reached out to my Production Team here and in NY.. And I contacted my factory overseas….to see if I could get some answers regarding: The production cycle – and being able to identify product by label etc… So it has taken some time to go to the appropriate people who might help

In identifying the timeline as to when this was made, who purchased the hat and when we changed our labeling.

Unfortunately – I cannot give you a ‘definitive’ answer, although I can give you a really good idea and bet that I am 98% correct. I would just hate to find out that it could be wrong, so please keep that in mind.

The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped us in our search. Here are the areas of issue:

1. I cannot see if there is a Flexfit ‘Flag’ label (This specific label was only produced and sold on the east coast for a period of time. I can speculate that it was during this time based on the style of the hat, because I have been working here for well over 20 years, but it is not definitive.) This is on the brim, where the crown meets the brim top side.

2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any that we have produced, which is odd because I have contacted our overseas production department as well, and they also do not use those numbers.

We produce blank inventory such as the bucket cap – and they are shipped to 2 different distribution centers. One on the east coast and another on the west coast…so stock levels are sold and replenished regularly, but we do keep track of the numbers on the hats for inventory and identifying sales.

This style is carried over from year to year with little to no change –as it is a staple item. So we need to keep it consistent as possible for our customers/distributors who purchase it yearly, but I do recognize that this hat was during a year we had been making changes by the lot.

My California distribution center alone – receives on an average 5 to 7… 40 foot containers of various cap styles weekly.

3. We have done 5 updates to this cap within the last 20 years that I have been with the company.

a.) We removed the flag label from the brim – (I mentioned above) approx. 3 years ago. with that being said, that would have been in 2011. This photo was taken in 2012. That does not mean that this person would have not kept on to the hat after the year we removed that label. I would assume most people keep their hats years after their original purchase.

But we would have continued to sell through any product still in the warehouse until it was sold out – so it could have carried over longer than when we actually stopped producing it with the label. I know that they stopped selling this item on the east coast and west coast both around the end of 2012. (not sure on the exact month and day).

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me.

There is an ‘identifying marker’ on this item I can see from the photo you have given – that can tell us when it was made and where it was purchased…However I am still looking into the number listed on the hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find out the purchaser from this number.)

I’m sorry I could not be of more help right now – if you have any further questions please let me know. Until then I will continue to look into this and get back with you as my time allows. Sorry for the delayed response.

I wish you luck with what you’re looking for. I know it meant a lot to you.

Thank you, Best Regards, Leslie

There are several problems with Norris' weak attempt at passing off this fake email.

When the screen shots were posted of the emails she allegedly exchanged,  they appeared fake. 

All of the emails bear the familiar style formatting known of current Gmail:

"One of these things is not like the other, can you tell me which one it is?"

• 
  

  
  
• 

  Bridget Norris Then a week later I sent her this email......
  

  
  

  
• 

  Bridget Norris No response....... I kept calling her at that point.. I was told that she was out of town and would not be back for a week or so....so I persisted once again....
• 

  Bridget Norris Still not getting a response from 'L', and this was now on August 13th, 2014. About 2 and a half weeks later.
  

  
  

  

   
  
  
  

  
  
• 

  Bridget Norris And the date stamp on that email.....
  

  
  

  

  
  

  
  
• 

  Bridget Norris Then she finally responded to me......

  
  
• 
  

  
  

An enlarged sample of the above shows that the alleged email does at least match the style and formatting of a real Gmail, and she is able to provide header data.



However, Bridget's original post does NOT match Gmail. Neither do Fetzer or Yvonne's versions.   An offline created fake? Very likely.

The header not only doesn't match Bridget's previous Gmails, it doesn't match the Gmail style or format; an obvious sign of Bridget's dishonest tactic.

Fraud #2: "Markings & Numbers?"

The alleged email from Flexfit:

"The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped us in our search. Here are the areas of issue"

Walkey 476 - Crime Scene Photo

According to the email, Bridget only gave one photo, which according to her posts above appears to be crime scene photo "Walkey #476".

For the purposes of this blog, I retrieved a copy from the report itself, to give us the best possible view of the photo.


Pay close attention to the wording above that Bridget alleged "I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers"

I don't care how much you blow that photo up, there are only TWO numbers on that photo.  "98" and "2", as in "98% Cotton" and "2% P.U. Spandex".  Feel free to test it out yourself.


 The fact is, there are NO other numbers, strongly indicating this portion of the email was likely completely fabricated.


Fraud #3  More mysterious numbers:
The alleged email from Flexfit:

2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any that we have produced

What numbers?

The hat is 98% Cotton and 2% Spandex, for years, as attested to by the wayback machine, this archive being from 2011:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110216023129/http://www.flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat

Prior to 2011 the Flexfit 5003 bucket hat was archived here, going back to 2009 -
https://web.archive.org/web/20090130043401/http://flexfit.com/product/5003

Same numbers.


The fabric percentages are the only numbers in the photo indicating fraud because the writer is talking about numbers that quite simply, do not exist.  The fabric numbers have not changed since at least 2009, as far as Wayback Machine goes.


Fraud #4 New Sweatband

From alleged email from Flexfit:

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me.

According to the VicePresident of Flexfit and according to the website and current inventory listings on numerous websites (include even ebay), the new Flexfit headband is currently being sold and looks quiet different than the one in the crime scene photograph. From Flexfit's website, which matches the email from the Vice President:


One can easily tell the new flexfit sweatband does not have the big writing "Flexfit" on it.



According to the 2013 Catalog, the old one was in use:

http://westsideshowroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/FLEX-FIT-2013.pdf

That matched the Wayback Machine from August 2013:

http://web.archive.org/web/20130809172916/http://flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat

which, incidentally, the description of the did not change since wayback archived the website in 2011 (above), matching what the Vice President of Flexfit said in his email.

March 2014 brought the nerw style to the website in March 2014 according to the Wayback Machine:

New Flexfit sweatband

http://web.archive.org/web/20140326214204/http://flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat

This matches the current webpage:

http://flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat

Likewise, the new catalog describes the new sweatband and shows a photo (see page 14):

http://www.flexfit.com/VG4RvOE7q5NPwnD/1389086713-FLEXFIT2014CATALOG.pdf

The old style, matching the shooters can be seen here:

http://capon.se/hattar/flexfit-buckethat-khaki

Note I archived it for furture reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20140831054418/http://capon.se/hattar/flexfit-buckethat-khaki

or here:

Matching the shooters hat here:

Fraud #5 More Mysterious non-existent numbers:

The alleged email from Flexfit:

However I am still looking into the number listed on the hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find out the purchaser from this number.)

Felxtfit?  Anyway... WHAT NUMBERS?

There are NO NUMBERS to identify this hat in the photo.


Fraud #6 This isn't the sweatband we are looking for

Attempting Jedi mind tricks after being caught red handed in multiple lies,  The hoaxers deftly  switch gears because the distinctive new sweatband could never be confused with the old sweatband.  To attempt to weasel out of the lies they dug themselves, they are pushing a new and improved slant:

"The band itself is not what we are looking for. It could be the smallest thing like stitch, color, materiel used. etc

The band is not what we are looking for?

But didn't your alleged email clearly state: 

We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me.

Nice attempt to change gears.


PATENTS:

The new sweatband patent design was filed by Yupoong August 20,2013.  Click Here
A list of all Yupoon patents: Click Here



The evidence of Hoaxer scheme is overwhelming. In fact, there is not a shred of evidence to back up hoaxer claims.  We must "take their word for it"  and must do so in the face of a mountain of contradictory evidence, a statement by the Vice President of the company, and archived historical web data.