Thursday, October 9, 2014

Sandy Hook Hoaxer threatens to kill Lenny Pozner


 Sandy Hook Hoaxer
Death Threat to Parent

 "Lenny soon the world will all know what you did then where
going to come after you and kill you slowly you fucken cunt"

"id love just 10 min with you you fucken jew cunt id tear your head of"

--- Sandy Hook Hoaxer Andrew Vaessen

And just what did Lenny Pozner "do"?  His son was murdered on December 14, 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School. And for that, somebod the Hoaxers have marked him for death. 

Vaeseen's Google+ page paints the chilling portrait. It should be noted that Alton Nolen, who beheaded a Oklahoma woman similarly ranted on his facebook advertising his radical beliefs, desires and intent. Nolen's open rants were ignored; a woman paid with her life in a brutal death.

We've learned from past Sandy Hook Hoaxer threats, they mean business.

Sandy Hook Hoaxer Jared Miller Facebook and YouTube rants were ignored.  3 innocent people, including 2 police officers, were gunned down.


Brent Cole, another avid Sandy Hook Hoaxer, ranted on facebook and Google+, in the same manner as Vaessen, and Cole attempted to murder a police officer.



The clock is ticking until a hoaxer is inspired to kill a Newtown parent or child.  Do we just ignore those who threaten and bully on internet while waiting for the killing spree?


























Presented by at No comments:
Labels:

Saturday, September 6, 2014

Sandy Hook Hoax Debunking Part 2 - Sandy Hook Hoax Debunked


Sandy Hook Hoax Debunking
Part 2


This is a comprehensive debunking of claims by Sandy Hook "hoaxers" as researched by Sandy Hook Expert Mike  Flagg.   The Sandy Hook massacre took place December 14, 2014 in a village of Newtown, Connecticut.  Subsequent to that horrific shooting, Sandy Hook Hoax was created by Youtubers and Bloggers.  Sandy Hook Hoax is a fiction, a fabricated "event"  contrived by conspiracy theorists using 'photoshopped' images, fraudulent evidence, and carefully snipped video presented to paint the Sandy Hook Massacre as a "False Flag' operation.   -- C.W. Wade

Part I of Michael Flagg's Debunking can be found here:
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/07/sandy-hook-hoax-claims-debunked.html

 

The Debunking:


19. The claim that two weapons were found in the trunk of AL's car.
  • "Seized from suspect’s car in parking lot:
#4. Izhmash Canta-12   12 gauge Shotgun    (seized from car in parking lot)" http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226 (Archive: https://archive.today/E418y)
  • From CFS 1200704559\Book 6\00258036.pdf, page 3 of Officer Leonard Penna's interview: "Shortly after I went back outside to the front of the building and looked through the inside of the suspect vehicle. I then observed a long gun on the floor of the back seat. I removed the long gun with a loose magazine and placed it into the trunk of the vehicle to secure it." https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLYnNzZ2ZUTlhwR2c/edit?usp=sharing

20. Children evacuating/being escorted from Sandy Hook Elementary School.
  • While children evacuating/being escorted from the school are redacted in the dash camera recordings, there are some photos.
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/07/sandy-hook-evacuation-photos-hundreds.html

21. The claim that we were lied about when school evacuation times were, via the final report timeline, due to the dash camera recordings not matching up.
  • From CFS 1200704559\Book 4\00184096.pdf, page 1 (going by the page number on the document): "The programmed times on several mobile video recorders were found to have been set incorrectly. For the purpose of this summary, those times have been corrected to reflect the actual time as determined by utilizing accurately documented communications from the dispatch center and now correlate with the times of the dispatch centers and properly set mobile video recorders." https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLWkFPVkdBaDNMekk/edit?usp=sharing
  • PDF file, Newtown Police Response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting..., refers to dash camera recordings from Newtown Police Department (which the times correlate with the final report timeline), not the State Police dash camera recordings that were released with the final report.
    Page 8:
    "Disclaimer
The information contained in this report is based on the documentation, audio, video, and statements, provided to us by Newtown Police Department in September of 2013." https://www.cpcanet.org/site/assets/files/1144/cpca_newtown_report_final.pdf (Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20140709201732/https://www.cpcanet.org/site/assets/files/1144/cpca_newtown_report_final.pdf)

22. The claim that Lenny Pozner, father of victim Noah Pozner, was not at his son's funeral.
23. The claim that the money shown in a photo, from the final report, was found in Victoria Soto's classroom.
24. The claim that TransAct Technologies, where Benjamin Wyatt works at, is not a real business.
2319 Whitney Ave, Suite 3B
Hamden, CT 06518
25. The claim that Steve DeMartino, who is on the mailing address for sending checks to donate for Allison Wyatt Memorial Fund and Fund For Allison's Sister, is the name of someone who has passed away before December 14, 2012.
26. The claim that two nuns are wearing identification badges, wearing 511 Tactical Shoes, and that one nun is carrying a gun under her coat.
27. The claim that a 2010 forum post, by kathaksung, predicted the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.
28. Sandy Hook appearing on the Gotham City map in The Dark Knight Rises movie.
  • "Susan Getzinger: I haven’t seen the movie Batman yet and my husband never told me the ending of anything (they are under strict confidentiality with hiring contracts, etc…) but it is COMMON practice for props guys especially to put cool family/neighborhood things in films as a cool fluke for their kids, etc…
My husband was always doing stuff like that if the movie permitted it and it received approval (directors, producers have the final say). I am sure the people in the film didn’t even know that Sandy Hook was a real place, just sounds cool for a film’s map." http://www.insanemedia.net/susan-getzinger-exclusive-interview-scott-getzinger-batman-map/1287 (Archive: https://archive.today/iCKwl)

29. The claim that Dr. H. Wayne Carver, Chief Medical Examiner, supported Bill 1045.
  • Wayne Carver is stating that he believes the current statue, regulations and practices already address the issues that are in the proposed Bill 1045, thus he does not support the bill, finding it redundant and unnecessary.
"I believe that the proposed legislation is however, redundant of current statue, regulations and practices."
"I do however; believe that the current statutory and regulatory scheme covers the issues that I perceived to be addressed by the proposed legislation."

30. The claim that Lt. Paul Vance said that anyone who spreads misinformation about the Sandy Hook, December 14th shooting, will be prosecuted.
  • From Lt. Vance's press conference, he states: "There has been misinformation coming from people posing as the shooter in this case, posing using other IDs, mimicking this crime and crime scene and criminal activity that took place in this community. There's been some things in somewhat of a threatening manner."
    "So any of that information and people that are putting that information up there, in any manner, alright, that can be construed as a violation of state or federal law, will be investigated and prosecuted." http://videos.huffingtonpost.com/miami/conn-police-warn-of-misinformation-about-shooting-517605625
Lt. Vance is clearly referring to what is found to be state or federal law violations, as also noted in the official press release below.
  • "Additionally, “anyone who harasses or threatens the victims, victims’ families or witnesses of these horrific crimes, or who, in any manner interferes with the ongoing state or federal investigations will be referred for state and/or federal prosecution to the fullest extent permitted by law.  Harassment not only includes in-person contact, but also contact via the internet, social media, and telephone.”  Social media includes, but is not limited to, Facebook, Blogs, YouTube, Twitter, Pinterest, and MySpace.  Harassment or interfering includes, but is not limited to, making claims of your involvement in the crime or making claims that hinder the advancement of the investigation." http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?A=4226&Q=515570 (Archive: https://archive.today/GDQSF)
31. The number of students who attended Sandy Hook Elementary School.
  • From CFS 1200704559\Book 2\00006263.pdf: "The student enrollment as of December 13, 2012 was 489. Due to lack of time, student attendance was not taken on December 14, 2012. The total staff count for the school is 91. On December 14, 2012, there were 9 staff members absent thus leaving a total of 82 staff members in the school that day. Refer to attached email." https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLOVRNM1VnanNWZFU/edit?usp=sharing
Two students probably left between the time frame of November 30th and December 13th, though getting that confirmed would be great.

32. In regard to Adam Lanza's AAA card and Ryan Lanza's AAA card.
  • An email reply after contacting AAA Member Relations: "The first 3 digits are the company identifier number and the last digit is the computerized number associated with the membership number."
The second set, 3 digits, is the club code, and the third set, 9 digits, is the membership number: http://imgur.com/IJFviUW.jpg
  • AL's AAA card: 620 240 421600221 9
620 is the company identifier number.
240 is the club code.
421600221 is the membership number.
9 is the computerized number associated with the membership number.
  • Ryan's AAA card: 438 240 421600201 8
438 is the company identifier number.
240 is the club code.
421600201 is the membership number.
8 is computerized number associated with the membership number.
  • Both, AL and Ryan, have the same 240 club code, because 240 indicates the region of the card member. In this case, AAA Southern New England.
A list of the AAA regions and club codes: https://www.hertz.com/rentacar/misc/index.jsp?targetPage=AAAcdps.jsp (Archive: https://archive.today/lpaDA#selection-1838.0-1838.1)

"Serving AAA Members in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island*" http://www.aaa.com/aaa/240/sem/membership/index.html?zip=02021 (Archive: https://archive.today/Nqx8G)
Note the 240 in the URL.

Even if you have a whole family on the same account, the last 3 digits of the membership number will be different to denote each individual person. 221 for AL; 201 for Ryan.

33. The claim that AL had a kill-to-wounded ratio of 26:1 or 96.2% (or higher).
The 96.2% ratio claim includes 1 wounded survivor and that 27 shots were fired. However, there were 2 wounded survivors and 154 shots fired. Implying there were 27 shots fired, gives the impression that there were no misses, when that is absolutely not true. The ratio was actually 26:2 or 92.8571%, which rounds up to 92.9%.      

Hallway (4 adults)
2 wounded (survived)
2 dead

Room 8 (16 children, 2 adults):
1 child unharmed
15 children dead
2 adults dead

Room 10 (16 children, 2 adults):
11 children unharmed
5 children dead
2 adults dead

Just going by the numbers above, there were 40 people in AL's path. From those 40 people, 28 were shot, which is a 70% ratio (28 divided by 40 x 100). That is going by targets (40 people that could have been shot) and hits (28 people that were shot). Kill-to-wounded ratio is being used in a tactical sense, but this was a school shooting, not a war, and AL had the intention to shoot as many people as he could. After all, AL fired 154 rounds and officers found 253 live rounds on his body.
Considering there were 80 rounds fired in room 8 (1 child unharmed) and 49 rounds fired in room 10 (11 children unharmed), that shows AL was not the "all-time world accuracy record" that has been claimed.

34. The claim that Christopher Manfredonia was in the woods and wearing camo pants.
A guy was being walked out of the woods in handcuffs.
He walked by people, looked into a parent's eyes, and said "I didn't do it."
At the time of the witness being interviewed, the guy was sitting in the front of a police car.
The witness did not see him with a gun.
The witness describes him wearing camo pants with a dark jacket.
  • However, Christopher Manfredonia was never in the woods, and he was not wearing camo pants.
"I know Chris. His daughter was in the same class as my son for two years ( k and 1st) I also know the officer who tackled him, by a side door of the school ( by playground, which was near our classes door, and why he went that way. He was there a minute or two before me, saw gun smoke and went to find daughter. Came around the corner with cell phone in hAnd. Was tackled and held until our class came out and his daughter called him daddy. He was wearing khakis, loafers and a polo... Standard fair for an athletic director." (Facebook message.)

"Chris Manfredonia, whose 6-year-old daughter attends the school, was heading there Friday morning to help make gingerbread houses with first-graders when he heard popping sounds and smelled sulfur.

He ran around the school trying to reach his daughter and was briefly handcuffed by police. He later found his child, who had been locked in a small room with a teacher." http://articles.latimes.com/2012/dec/14/nation/la-na-1215-newtown-school-shooting-20121215 (Archive: https://archive.today/XIx8J)

"On Friday morning, her husband, Chris, went to help make gingerbread houses in the first-grade class of the couple’s daughter. As he approached the school, he heard popping sounds, then smelled sulfur.

He attempted to reach his daughter by going around the side of the school. Police had arrived by then, stopped him and briefly handcuffed him." http://articles.latimes.com/2012/dec/14/nation/la-na-nn-sandy-hook-connecticut-school-shooting-20121214 (Archive: https://archive.today/6kshG)

"A couple of FCIAC athletic directors also have close ties to Newtown. Fairfield Warde AD Chris Manfredonia not only has a daughter at Sandy Hook Elementary School, but he had just pulled into the parking lot and was on his way into the school to help his daughter's class build a gingerbread house when he heard shots ring out." http://www.thehour.com/sports/george-albano-column-tragedy-in-newtown-has-hit-home/article_a0812fe4-4b60-5300-aaf1-c08c51ff25fc.html

"Several officers ran to the playground on the side of the school to assist McGowan in arresting Christopher Manfredonia, who was walking into the school to help make gingerbread men when he heard shots. Manfredonia was running towards the side of the building where his daughters classroom was located when police tackled him." http://articles.courant.com/2014-02-24/news/hc-sandy-hook-police-video-20140224_1_officers-school-security-expert-sandy-hook-elementary-school (Archive: https://archive.today/tx8y8)

"9:41:24 — McGowan detains parent Christopher Manfredonia outside the school. The parent heard shots and ran toward playground area. Several Newtown officers respond to McGowan's call for assistance, including Chief Michael Kehoe and Captain Joseph Rios." http://articles.courant.com/2013-11-30/news/hc-sandy-hook-police-response-text-box1201-2-20131130_1_adam-lanza-timeline-teacher-victoria-soto (Archive: https://archive.today/pwwIA)

From CFS 1200704559\Book 4\00184096.pdf, page 6 (going by the page number on the document):
"9:40:46 First indication that Officer McGowan has [redacted] in custody on the east side of the school near the playground. (Newtown radio)"
Page 7 (going by the page number on the document): "9:41:24 Officer McGowan has [redacted] prone out on the playground of SHES." https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLWkFPVkdBaDNMekk/edit?usp=sharing

CFS 1200704559\Book 5\00014498.pdf, page 2 is the summary report of the statement provided by Christopher Manfredonia: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLMjVnbVdXNUtmTTg/edit?usp=sharing


35. Noah Pozner did not have an autopsy done.
  • As stated in page 1 of 3 in the postmortem examination report: "Internal examination is not performed in keeping with the wishes of the family as expressed to the undersigned through a representative of the funeral home." http://imgur.com/hEQ07BL.jpg
However; Lenny Pozner, father of victim Noah Pozner, got this cleared up after emailing James Gill, Chief Medical Examiner (who also stated they define an autopsy as an external and internal postmortem examination): "Unfortunately, in my cover letter to the State Police, I incorrectly used "26 autopsy reports" and this was then later included in State Police report. I am sorry for the confusion this has caused you and I have contacted Alison Peters of the State Police to let her know." http://imgur.com/kPLK6m1.jpg

36. The claim that Alex Israel (former classmate of AL) and Katie Foley (sister of deceased journalist James Foley) are one and the same person.
37. The claim that AL's Flexfit bucket hat was not available for purchase until 2013.
  • While an email was sent to Leslie Umphrey, General Manager at Flexfit, her response was modified by the sender, Bridget Norris. 
Modified email:
http://imgur.com/WVMZ1Wa.png
http://imgur.com/cWAlzpK.png



Original email: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLbW1VcjBnU3BjODg/edit?usp=sharing
Unlike what Bridget modified in Leslie's email response with: "We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me," the actual truth, straight from Vice President Brian Yang at Flexfit, is: "We have made the inner sweatband changes which took place in 2014. Therefore, the sweatband with “Flexfit” legible ones were produced between 2005, when we launched the product line until 2014 when we made the running change."

38. The claim that Sandy Hook Elementary School was not in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), further proving the school was abandoned/closed.While I do not know for sure if Sandy Hook Elementary School was ADA-compliant or not, it is not uncommon for schools to not be ADA-compliant.
  • April 13, 2011. Page 1: "Superintendent Robinson noted there are many considerations in closing an elementary school. The neighborhood elementary school is a tradition. If one of the elementary schools were to be closed, Hawley, as the oldest, is the logical one. It is not ADA compliant and cannot be made ADA compliant." 
  • March 6, 2012. Page 12: Under Consolidation Considerations:
    "Hawley, small and central to town, is not ADA compliant
    Must be made compliant if reopened or for use as a public building"
Since Sandy Hook Elementary School was built in 1956, Crystal Lake Elementary School is a good example to use since it is still an operating school. While there is a lot that can be shown to prove Crystal Lake Elementary was and is still an operating school, I will just show some information as to not go too off-topic.Crystal Lake Elementary School website: http://www.ellingtonpublicschools.org/page.cfm?p=2068

Student and teacher enrollment for Crystal Lake Elementary School going back from 1987: http://www.publicschoolreview.com/school_ov/school_id/15582 (Archive: https://archive.today/MQppB)

2009-2010  No Child Left Behind (NCLB) report cards: http://ctayp.emetric.net/Content/ReportCards/2010/100481002_2010.PDF (Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20140905033648/http://ctayp.emetric.net/Content/ReportCards/2010/100481002_2010.PDF)

2010-2011 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) report cards: http://ctayp.emetric.net/Content/ReportCards/2011/100481002_2011.PDF (Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20140905033648/http://ctayp.emetric.net/Content/ReportCards/2010/100481002_2010.PDF)

2014-2015 bus routes: http://www.ellingtonpublicschools.org/page.cfm?p=6822
Presented by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Sandy Hook Hoax Fraud - Original Flexfit Email Released

 Sandy Hook Hoax
Fabricated Evidence - Final Proof!
The original Flexfit email released.


Sandy Hook hoaxers were caught red-handed intentionally passing fake evidence.
A hoaxer fabricated an email that the Hoaxer Crew claimed to be from Flexfit and was used to attempt to show Adam Lanza's hat was not manufactured until 2013! It has turned out to be contrived evidence and Flexfit did not stand for it and set the record straight!


Catching Sandy Hook Hoax blatantly fabricating evidence has shocked all legitimate researchers.


Originally debunked here:


1. http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/08/sandy-hook-hoax-caught-manipulating.html


The flaws with the' fabrication of the Flexfit email was further detailed in a subsequent post.  While they hoaxer claimed the hat bore "numbers" (that apparently only she could see)  and those numbers could identify the purchaser of the hat.

2. http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/08/sandy-hook-hoax-perpetuates-their-fraud.html


3. See also Keith's Article here, which includes the audio of the phone call:
http://sandyhookstalkers.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/the-sandy-hook-flexfit-hoax/

There was one loose end that needed to be tied up to complete the debunking ,the "smoking gun".  

We needed the original email to prove Sandy Hook Hoax's underhanded scheme once and for all.

Keith Johnson stepped up to the plate and contacted Flexfit, speaking personally to the Vice President by phone and the VP agreed to help us put this to rest and to provide the original email that was recovered by Flexfit IT personnel.


Comparing the real email below, with Sandy Hook Hoax's fabricated version (bottom of post), you start to gain insight into the fraud that was attempted: .


 



A deleted post has been recovered from archives that shows Bridgett (aka Adam Babb) talking about the nonexistent serial numbers that she believes she can see on the ha.  There are no serial numbers on the hat, an easily observed fact:


Evidence Photo that she claims contains these secret numbers:





Presented by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Sandy Hook Hoax Perpetuates their Fraud - Flexfit Bucket Hat

The Sandy Hook Hoax crew have been caught red handed manipulating evidence are desperately pulling out all the stops in an irrational attempt to carry on the charade.

Hoaxer:
"To me, it is the first concrete, indisputable evidence of the Report being fabricated"

Indisputable?


As reported by SandyHookFacts.com:
http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/08/sandy-hook-hoax-caught-manipulating.html

The email is not only in dispute, it is proven to be modified to the extent that it is nothing but a phoney.


The hoaxer crew posted an email that purported to prove the bucket hat Adam Lanza wore in his attack on Sandy Hook Hoax Elementary School was made after 2013.  She alleged she obtained this information from an email from Flexfit that stated the sweatband in the hat was the new sweatband  and was not produced until 2013.

The Hoaxers ran with the story without doing a single bit of internet research or fact checking.   Soon, Flexfit's Vice President declared in the Hoaxer email was manipulated by the hoaxers, prior to posting it and changing what the employee had said.

Caught red-handed!

The Vice President's email further went on to detail that the new Flexfit sweatband, a band that did not go into production until a "running change in 2014".  The one shown in Lanza's photo was manufactured between 2005-2013, and was the old style.  A photo of the new headband was provided by Flexfit's VP and makes clear the difference.

New style sweatband

Crime Scene photo: old style sweatband



This is not the first time Hoaxers have been caught fraudulently inventing "evidence", and it wont be the last. Previous hoaxer fabrication of evidence includes the "Check-In Here Sign", "26 Christmas Trees", "Helicopter fly-over Time", and Camera.

This is the first time that we have documented it from the very moment they began their perpetration.

Lets take a close look at the' alleged email and look at online archived web evidence of the sweatband:

 First, the text of the email as posted by Bridget , taken from Jim Fetzer's

From: Leslie<leslie@flexfit.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: HELLO??
To: “Bridget”

Hello Bridget, Sorry for the delay in responding… I have reached out to my Production Team here and in NY.. And I contacted my factory overseas….to see if I could get some answers regarding: The production cycle – and being able to identify product by label etc… So it has taken some time to go to the appropriate people who might help

In identifying the timeline as to when this was made, who purchased the hat and when we changed our labeling.

Unfortunately – I cannot give you a ‘definitive’ answer, although I can give you a really good idea and bet that I am 98% correct. I would just hate to find out that it could be wrong, so please keep that in mind.

The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped us in our search. Here are the areas of issue:

1. I cannot see if there is a Flexfit ‘Flag’ label (This specific label was only produced and sold on the east coast for a period of time. I can speculate that it was during this time based on the style of the hat, because I have been working here for well over 20 years, but it is not definitive.) This is on the brim, where the crown meets the brim top side.

2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any that we have produced, which is odd because I have contacted our overseas production department as well, and they also do not use those numbers.

We produce blank inventory such as the bucket cap – and they are shipped to 2 different distribution centers. One on the east coast and another on the west coast…so stock levels are sold and replenished regularly, but we do keep track of the numbers on the hats for inventory and identifying sales.

This style is carried over from year to year with little to no change –as it is a staple item. So we need to keep it consistent as possible for our customers/distributors who purchase it yearly, but I do recognize that this hat was during a year we had been making changes by the lot.

My California distribution center alone – receives on an average 5 to 7… 40 foot containers of various cap styles weekly.

3. We have done 5 updates to this cap within the last 20 years that I have been with the company.

a.) We removed the flag label from the brim – (I mentioned above) approx. 3 years ago. with that being said, that would have been in 2011. This photo was taken in 2012. That does not mean that this person would have not kept on to the hat after the year we removed that label. I would assume most people keep their hats years after their original purchase.

But we would have continued to sell through any product still in the warehouse until it was sold out – so it could have carried over longer than when we actually stopped producing it with the label. I know that they stopped selling this item on the east coast and west coast both around the end of 2012. (not sure on the exact month and day).

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me.

There is an ‘identifying marker’ on this item I can see from the photo you have given – that can tell us when it was made and where it was purchased…However I am still looking into the number listed on the hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find out the purchaser from this number.)

I’m sorry I could not be of more help right now – if you have any further questions please let me know. Until then I will continue to look into this and get back with you as my time allows. Sorry for the delayed response.

I wish you luck with what you’re looking for. I know it meant a lot to you.

Thank you, Best Regards, Leslie



There are several problems with Norris' weak attempt at passing off this fake email.

When the screen shots were posted of the emails she allegedly exchanged,  they appeared fake. 

All of the emails bear the familiar style formatting known of current Gmail:


"One of these things is not like the other, can you tell me which one it is?"


  • Bridget Norris Then a week later I sent her this email......

  • Bridget Norris No response....... I kept calling her at that point.. I was told that she was out of town and would not be back for a week or so....so I persisted once again....
  • Bridget Norris Still not getting a response from 'L', and this was now on August 13th, 2014. About 2 and a half weeks later.

  • Bridget Norris And the date stamp on that email.....

  • Bridget Norris Then she finally responded to me......




An enlarged sample of the above shows that the alleged email does at least match the style and formatting of a real Gmail, and she is able to provide header data.



However, Bridget's original post does NOT match Gmail. Neither do Fetzer or Yvonne's versions.   An offline created fake? Very likely.




The header not only doesn't match Bridget's previous Gmails, it doesn't match the Gmail style or format; an obvious sign of Bridget's dishonest tactic.

 Fraud #2: "Markings & Numbers?"

The alleged email from Flexfit:
"The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped us in our search. Here are the areas of issue"

Walkey 476 - Crime Scene Photo
According to the email, Bridget only gave one photo, which according to her posts above appears to be crime scene photo "Walkey #476".

For the purposes of this blog, I retrieved a copy from the report itself, to give us the best possible view of the photo.


Pay close attention to the wording above that Bridget alleged "I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers"

I don't care how much you blow that photo up, there are only TWO numbers on that photo.  "98" and "2", as in "98% Cotton" and "2% P.U. Spandex".  Feel free to test it out yourself.


 The fact is, there are NO other numbers, strongly indicating this portion of the email was likely completely fabricated.


Fraud #3  More mysterious numbers:
The alleged email from Flexfit:
2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any that we have produced

What numbers?

The hat is 98% Cotton and 2% Spandex, for years, as attested to by the wayback machine, this archive being from 2011:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110216023129/http://www.flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat

Prior to 2011 the Flexfit 5003 bucket hat was archived here, going back to 2009 -
https://web.archive.org/web/20090130043401/http://flexfit.com/product/5003

Same numbers.


The fabric percentages are the only numbers in the photo indicating fraud because the writer is talking about numbers that quite simply, do not exist.  The fabric numbers have not changed since at least 2009, as far as Wayback Machine goes.


Fraud #4 New Sweatband

From alleged email from Flexfit:


b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me.
According to the VicePresident of Flexfit and according to the website and current inventory listings on numerous websites (include even ebay), the new Flexfit headband is currently being sold and looks quiet different than the one in the crime scene photograph. From Flexfit's website, which matches the email from the Vice President:


One can easily tell the new flexfit sweatband does not have the big writing "Flexfit" on it.



According to the 2013 Catalog, the old one was in use:
http://westsideshowroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/FLEX-FIT-2013.pdf



That matched the Wayback Machine from August 2013:
http://web.archive.org/web/20130809172916/http://flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat

which, incidentally, the description of the did not change since wayback archived the website in 2011 (above), matching what the Vice President of Flexfit said in his email.

March 2014 brought the nerw style to the website in March 2014 according to the Wayback Machine:
New Flexfit sweatband

http://web.archive.org/web/20140326214204/http://flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat
This matches the current webpage:
http://flexfit.com/hats/223/5003-flexfit-cotton-twill-bucket-hat


Likewise, the new catalog describes the new sweatband and shows a photo (see page 14):

http://www.flexfit.com/VG4RvOE7q5NPwnD/1389086713-FLEXFIT2014CATALOG.pdf

The old style, matching the shooters can be seen here:

http://capon.se/hattar/flexfit-buckethat-khaki

Note I archived it for furture reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20140831054418/http://capon.se/hattar/flexfit-buckethat-khaki


or here:
Matching the shooters hat here:


Fraud #5 More Mysterious non-existent numbers:

The alleged email from Flexfit:
However I am still looking into the number listed on the hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find out the purchaser from this number.)


Felxtfit?  Anyway... WHAT NUMBERS?

There are NO NUMBERS to identify this hat in the photo.


Fraud #6 This isn't the sweatband we are looking for

Attempting Jedi mind tricks after being caught red handed in multiple lies,  The hoaxers deftly  switch gears because the distinctive new sweatband could never be confused with the old sweatband.  To attempt to weasel out of the lies they dug themselves, they are pushing a new and improved slant:


"The band itself is not what we are looking for. It could be the smallest thing like stitch, color, materiel used. etc

The band is not what we are looking for?

But didn't your alleged email clearly state: 
We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me.
Nice attempt to change gears.


 PATENTS:

The new sweatband patent design was filed by Yupoong August 20,2013.  Click Here
A list of all Yupoon patents: Click Here



The evidence of Hoaxer scheme is overwhelming. In fact, there is not a shred of evidence to back up hoaxer claims.  We must "take their word for it"  and must do so in the face of a mountain of contradictory evidence, a statement by the Vice President of the company, and archived historical web data.




 
Presented by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)