Wednesday, January 28, 2015

William Shanley's Lawsuit DISMISSED

 William Shanley's "Sandy Hook Hoax" lawsuit vs
Bee, Courant, New York Times et al is DISMISSED
"frivolous and no plausible grounds for relief...."

Without motion, hearing, or requiring an answer of the defendants, the federal court has summarily dismissed one of the two "trillion dollar" Shanley lawsuits.   I will post a blog update when I get the documents for the second dismissal; anticipated as coming soon.

The lawsuit discussed here:

Shanley is still sitting in jail on felony charges:

The dismissed case (Case No 3:14-cv-01881 JAM) was filed December 17, 2014.  The lawsuit sought in excess of 5 billion dollars and included defendants Shannon Hicks, The Bee, New York Times, and the Hartford Courant, among others and alleged vast government conspiracy citing and Wolfgang Halbig and James Fetzer as his experts.

The action was predictably dismissed as frivolous and failure to state a claim. In closing, the court wrote:

"In short, plaintiff’s claims are frivolous and furnish no plausible or conceivable grounds for relief. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2) and motion to participate in electronic filing (Doc. #5) are DENIED as moot in light of the dismissal of this action."

I will update this post with a link to the full order of the court as soon as the pdf host is finished with maintenance.  There is also a second order that I am trying to get my hands on.

Full PDF:

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Sandy Hook Parents Lawsuit Moved to Federal Court

The lawsuits filed by victims of the Sandy Hook shooting was removed to Federal Court.  The motion to remove the civil action from Connecticut state court was made by Remington Outdoor/Bushmaster Firearms International ("Bushmaster").  The Notice of Removal filed by Bushmaster on January 15, 2015.

In the lastest filing to the case, Defendants DAVID LAGUERCIA and RIVERVIEW SALES, INC. filed a motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint.

Defendant's also have noticed the court that they intend to file a motion to to dismiss the complaint pursuant to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, 15 U.S.C. §7901, et seq. and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

I will make documents for this case available as they become available to me on this post:

Sandy Hook Families vs Bushmaster - Federal Lawsuit Court Documents

As part of continuing coverage, I will update this post with documents from the lawsuit vs Bushmaster filed by the estates of victims of the Sandy Hook massacre on December 14, 2012 as they become available to me.

This lawsuit was reported on this blog here:

Since filing, the case is been removed to Federal court


Short Case title:




LLC a/k/a FREEDOM GROUP, INC. a/k/a )

Case No: 3:15-CV-00068-RNC
Hon. Robert Chatigny, District Court Judge

Available Documents:
(All filed documents are not listed here)

Soto v. Bushmaster Complaint - File Date 12-13-14

Notice of Removal - File Date 1-15-15 (excludes 64 pages of exhibits)

 Notice of Pending Motions - File date 1-15-15

Motion for Extension of Time (Riverview)  1-21-15 

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Keith Johnson solves mystery that has stumped Doom and InsaneMedia for months!

Keith has really been impressive with his channel; well researched information with sound debunkings.    Confounding Doom and many other conspiracy theorists  is the  police car in the parking lot of Sandy Hook Elementary School. Rising to the challenge, Keith answers their questions.

The answer is Laugh-Out-Loud funny

Saturday, January 17, 2015

Ross Elder's book on conspiracy theorists free- Just Stop

I am reblogging Ross Elder's facebook post. Get your free ebook!

This weekend only.  I've got my copy and will submit my review when it's done.

Okay then. Here's the deal. I need my latest book, Just Stop, to reach more people. So, I'm going to make the Kindle edition FREE for the weekend. If you don't have it, get it this weekend. Read it. (It's short) Then write a review on Amazon. Show the love!
There is a Kindle app for every device known to man, including the Space Station, but those pesky Russians refuse to get a copy. They're still bitter about all those satellite images of us flipping them the bird during the 80s.
It's going to be free so there are no excuses. Well, unless you can't read, in which case you aren't reading this message anyway so it doesn't matter. Have someone read it to you. It is a great love story, for all you lonely ladies out there. Yes, I read your posts. You need a cat. Until then, READ MY BOOK. Did I mention it will be free?
Friday, Saturday, Sunday til around noon.

Friday, January 16, 2015

William Shanley Jailed for Felony Assault on Public Safety Official

*Update: See also: Shanley's Lawsuit Dismissed!

Published conspiracy theorist William Shanley, of New London, Connecticut, caused a stir in the "conspiracy theorist" world when he filed federal lawsuits seeking a trillion dollars in damages alleging Sandy Hook was a hoax and the media coverage complicit and fraudulent.  Shanley filed his lawsuits "pro se" (without an attorney) and the suits contain irrational wild speculation and cite Jim Fetzer and Wolfgang Halbig as his experts; their writings as his evidence. can now confirm Shanley has been arrested on multiple charges including felony attempted assault on a public safety official/EMT.

 Shanley's pending lawsuit was covered in detail on this blog: 

Court Records
Court records indicate the following charges

StatuteDescriptionClassTypeOccOffense Date


53a-167aINTERFERE WITH OFFCR/RESISTINGAMisdemeanor112/31/2014

53a-181BREACH OF PEACE 2ND DEGBMisdemeanor112/31/2014

Records indicate Shanley was arrested on December 31, 2014 by the New London Police Department and further indicate his next hearing is set for February 4, 2015. 

Court Records also indicate other cases where Shanley was convicted of misdemeanor Breach of Peace on September 12, 2011 as well as listing several other unspecified criminal cases:

Other Docket Numbers#: L18WMV020210678S
Other Docket Numbers#: L18WCR020109363S
Other Docket Numbers#: L18WCR020109362S

 While these criminal cases would not likely have a direct effect on his trillion dollar lawsuit against the media organizations, I have already opined that the cases is a text book non-suit and will be dismissed without leave to amend at the outset because they fail to state a valid cause of action.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Negative Reaction to inevitable Sandy Hook Lawsuits

If you have been following the news and social media responses to the news of the lawsuits  filed by the estates of Noah Pozner and Jessie Lewis, two victims at the Sandy Hook massacre, you are now seeing some of the anticipated negative fall-out.

WTNH is carrying some of the reaction here:

I provided my review of the lawsuit here:

The lawsuit is powerful in presentation and outlines the statutes and duties governing the operation of school in this post-Columbine world and alleging very specific breaches of those statutory duties; the heart of a Negligence Per Se type action.

What good are statewide safety procedures if  the facilities do not have the capability to comply?

This is the crux of the question at hand.

 The answer may best be provided by insurance companies and their requirements upon facilities to obtain insurance at reasonable rates. Insurance companies nationwide will take notice of this action and this could result in a national good.

Isn't this preferred to more unfunded mandates pass by legislatures?  I would say so. 

Newtown should not take this lawsuit personal.  This lawsuit is necessary brave step to take this question to the next level; preventing tragedies like this in the future.  Newtown is simply the government entity that must be the defendant because this tragedy did happen there.

Monday, January 12, 2015

Sandy Hook Victim's Estates File Lawsuit Against Newtown

Sandy Hook Victim's Estates File Lawsuit Against Newtown

The lawsuit filed by the estates of two of the victims of the Sandy hook Shooting has now been made public.

This lawsuit was given to state marshals on December 14, 2014; the two year statutory limitation on filing such actions.

You would think that those hoaxers who impugn, harass, and violate the rights of Sandy Hook families, falsely believing these families "fear court", "fear deposition", or "fear discovery", might take note.  Do these lawsuits look like fear of court?  That's all I'm going to say...because more is my "humble opinion."

Links are here:

Full text of the lawsuit made available by The Courant:

Brief Review:

The lawsuit is 66 pages long.  The named plaintiffs (currently) are the estates of slain students Noah Pozner with Leonard Pozner, administrator and Jesse Lewis, with parents Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis as administrators. The families are represented by Norwalk attorney Donald Papcsy, a Sandy Hook resident.

The summons itself incorrectly names a defendant as "Sandy Hook Board of Education"; the appropriate agency is the Newtown Board of Education (as in the complaint).  The superintendent is also incorrectly spelled or incorrectly named "Joseph Eradi, Jr." and "Sandy Gombos" is incorrectly named as principle of Sandy Hook Elementary School, instead of "Kathleen Gombos".

Some of the claims of the lawsuit alleging negligence are as follows:

  • That doors to even numbered classrooms could not be locked from the inside making it impossible for the teachers to lock the doors.
  • The front entrance was not secure because the glass to the right of the front entrance was non-safety glass.
  • Even though the teachers were aware of shooting, they could not lock the doors in accordance with lock-down procedures established by Newtown.
  • The substitute in classroom 8 had no key to lock classroom 8 in any event.
It's important to note I have mathematically proven that Room 10 was the first classroom entered by the shooter based on casings and magazines analysis.  Therefore, the lawsuit is very on point. Room 8 would likely have had time to lock the door if Room 8 had that capability.  

  • The lawsuit lists the injured and killed in #20, 28, 29 correctly accounting for the killed and wounded.
This is mentioned because conspiracy theorists are already missing "#20" and only reading #28 & 29 thereby misrepresenting the number the complaint states is killed. Consider this a "pre-bunk debunk".
  • The lawsuit essentially claims that since there was no protective glass; locking the doors was futile.
  • There are a few technical errors those of us who study this shooting will immediately recognize; such as claiming a wounded teacher in Room 9, who was shot, called 911. Hammond, did not make a 911 call.  The lawsuit claims the shooter shot himself outside of Room 10.  None of these facts are material to the negligence alleged; despite what will surely be hoaxer uproar over this minutia.
  • That the school lacked proper security.
  • That the defendants were mandated by code to have certain procedure these provisions were not and/or could not be followed.
The lawsuit is for a Connecticut standard "Excess of $15,000"; no specific amount is prayed for.

As I've discussed many times; lawsuits against government entities after school shootings are historically mostly unsuccessful; however, since Columbine; codes, polices, and procedures have been mandated. But are they being implemented?  That could be the precedent here.

How many doors of schools or classrooms cannot be locked in the "post Sandy Hook" world?

This lawsuit can be boiled down to a fine point. It does no good to have "lock down" procedures and mandates if "locking" is impossible. In that light, this lawsuit could have national importance and it might be time to take a look at "lock down" and what it means in a real emergency.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook Debunked - DNA Evidence & Mr. Stosh

One of the fabrications of Sandy Hook Hoaxers are that "NO DNA evidence linking Adam Lanza to the crime".

Hoaxers accomplish this false premise by cherry picking select DNA evidence results from the report instead of presenting the report in full and with the intellectual honesty of an actual researcher.

Further, they present only the "Supplemental Report" and hide the evidence from the primary DNA report.

Keith Johnson debunks Mr. Stosh's DNA presentation in "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook".

 Put your thinking caps on - this one is heavy; as expected of a DNA presentation

Keith Johnson's websites are and

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Sandy Hook Helicopter News Footage Time Stamps

I was asked to take a look at the Connecticut News 12 chopper HD Footage and try to determine the time.  While my time stamp for the HD footage is not conclusive, I believe the helicopter footage to be at about 10:54 as it is filming the SHE Parking lot. This analysis was accomplished by analyzing Blumenthal's dash cam (and Davis') and through process of elimination settling on this shot as  the best time marker:

Screen shot from HD Footage and Blumenthal Dash Cam

Link to Full HD Video here:

Next, the Low Def Footage "Brown Footage" 

The Low Def Helicopter footage sometimes referred to as the "Brown footage" is confirmed as being at about 11:20.

My original analysis of this footage as a part of "Sandy Hook: The Deadliest Minute"
Is solid and irrefutable by logical analysis.

Full Low Def footage here:

All dash cams can be found as part of the Final Report for from this youtube channel

Sunday, January 4, 2015

We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook - EXIF Date Data Debunked

We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook - EXIF Date Data Debunked
Sandy Hook Hoax - EXIF Date Data Debunked
QK Ultra Debunked

This video debunks the Hoaxer claims that Newtown Bee's EXIF Data is evidence of pre-planning and hoax.

In "We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook", Conspiracy Theorist "QK Ultra"  downloaded a Newtown Bee video created and uploaded to Youtube on December 14, 2012 and discovered that the EXIF Data showed a creation date of December 13, 2012.

Without doing any further fact checking or investigation, Hoaxers have declared this a marquee piece of the "evidence."

When subjected to fact checking, the Hoaxer claim that the EXIF data of videos downloaded off of youtube did not stand up to close scrutiny; as is the case with every Hoaxer Claim.

We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook is debunked, again.